The SACR is rejected. Why WP is making all the same mistake as previous SCAR on other case I have highlighted?Did you use the supplier maturity assessment to grade the SCAR? What is the scoring? The scoring will unlikely to achieve 85% if there is no evidence included.- Why the problem statement is copy exactly as what Axcelis has highlighted again? Why WP is not using “Who, What, When, Why, How “ to identify the problem statement?- Why there is no quality tool use to identify the root cause? Where is 5 Why?o Why insufficient trained engineer is allowed to work alone (with any supervision to check his work is correct)?- The preventive action taken is not correct. Since the prependicalurity of a hole is critical, What action has been taken to ensure such requirement is remembered and practiced at all time?