Notice the [breaks] in Sample1. As

注意Sample1中的[breaks]。制作地图时，您可能还想记下您的想法。它以前没有盈利，但现在会盈利吗？为什么？在继续阅读该论点时，您已经在考虑这一点。后来，该论点说，农民可以从棉花中获得更多的收入，但是结论却说明了利润。利润等于收入减去强制转换。您已经得到一些证据，证明农场可能能够从棉花中赚更多的钱（甚至还值得商）），但是关于铸模的知识却一无所知，那么论点如何得出关于利润的结论呢？

请注意示例 1 中的 [中断]。在绘制地图时，您可能还想记下您的想法。以前不是盈利的，但现在会是盈利吗？为什么？当你继续阅读这个论点时， 你已经在考虑这个了。后来，争论说农民可以从棉花中赚取更多的收入，但结论说明了一些利润。利润等于收入减去铸件。你得到了一些证据，证明农场也许能够从棉花中赚更多的钱（甚至这是有争议的），但是你却被告知演员，那么争论怎么能得出任何利润的结论呢？

Notice the [breaks] in Sample1. As you make your map, you might also want to jot down what you're thinking. It wasn't profitable before, but it will be now? Why? you're already thinking about that as you continue to read the argument. Later, the argument says the farmers can earn more revenue from the cotton, but the conclusion said something about profits. Profit equals revenue minus casts. You've been given some evidence that the farms may be able to make more money from cotton (and even that's debatable),but you've been told nothing about casts, so how can the argument conclude anything about profits?<br>