One issue I have noticed with the R

我注意到这个时代的Rundschau系统的一个问题是，肩部缝隙在偏斜上稍微向后倾斜。这可能是较旧版本的系统遗留的信息，在该版本中，接缝处的偏差更大。我发现最好按照上述系统完成图案，然后将后肩缝向前推进1.5-2cm或直到它沿着肩中部向下延伸。后颈部也必须加宽1-1.5厘米（并且前部的项圈接缝减少相应的量）。<br>按照目前的情况，上面的Rundschau草稿将为您提供约7.8厘米的后颈，这类似于爱德华时代Cutter的实用指南系统中的3英寸后颈。现代的后颈通常比1950年的窄后颈更宽-60s，使肩膀更干净，肩膀臂向前倾斜。

我注意到这个时代的 Rundschau 系统的一个问题， 肩缝是一点点向后倾斜的偏见。这可能是旧版本的系统的遗物，其中接缝更偏置。我发现最好根据上述系统完成图案，然后将后肩接缝向前推进 1.5-2 厘米，或直到它从肩部中间向下移动。后颈还必须加宽1-1.5厘米（前部分的领缝减少相应量）。<br>就目前情况，上面的 Rundschau 草案将给你一个大约 7.8cm 后颈， 这是类似于在爱德华时代卡特的实用指南系统发现的 3" 后颈。现代后颈通常比 20 世纪 50 -60 年代较窄的后颈更宽，而且导致肩部更清洁，肩臂更向前。

One issue I have noticed with the Rundschau system of this era is that the shoulder seam is a tiny bit slanted backwards on the bias. This is likely a relic from older version of the system, in which the seam was even more on the bias. I find it best to complete the pattern according to the above system, and then advance the back shoulder seam forward by 1.5-2cm or until it runs down the middle of the shoulder. The back neck will also have to be widened by 1-1.5cm (and the collar seam of foreparts reduced by the corresponding amount).As it stands the above Rundschau draft will give you an approximately 7.8cm back neck, which is similar to the 3" back neck found in Edwardian era Cutter's Practical Guide systems. The modern back neck is typically wider than the narrower back neck of the 1950-60s, and results in a cleaner shoulder, as well as more forward pitch of the shoulder-armscye.<br>