Figures 23 and 24 show that the difference of cumulative energy dissipation between the left beam of the cast-in-place joint and the precast prestressed concrete joint was small and that the cumulative energy dissipation of the right beam of the PPCJ1 joint was slightly smaller than the other two joints. The cumulative energy dissipation of the PPCJ2 joint was slightly larger than that of the PPCJ1 joint. The energy dissipation of the right beam of the PPCJ2 joint was significantly larger than that of the PPCJ1 joint and was even larger than the cast-in-place joint. This difference may be due to the inconsistency in the construction. However, the cumulative energy dissipation of each joint was approximately linear. Thus, the energy dissipation capacity of each joint was uniform with the displacement, and the joint energy dissipation was stable.