1. IntroductionThe impact of digitalization on business processes has encouraged the transformation markets into complex networks based on unrepeatable processes of value co-creation that can give birth to new or improved products, services, and relational modalities [1]. Due to the connection between interactions, value co-creation, and the generation of innovation [2], service research proposes the adoption of a transcending view that explores the effect of technology and ICTs (information and communication technologies) on service improvement and on new service development [3,4]. In particular, by introducing the concept of service ecosystems, service- dominant logic (S-D logic, [5–7]) embraces a systems perspective that understands service as the glue of resource integration among engaged actors that, through a series of ICT-enabled interactions, can lead to value co-creation and innovation. Therefore, extant research progressively advances the need to analyze how technology-mediated exchanges can lead to value co-creation [8], well-being enhancement [9,10], and innovation [11,12] that can produce sustainability in the long run [13,14].However, the evolving and emergent nature of service exchanges increases the complexity and uncertainty in the harmonization and management of value co-creation, which becomes more and more unpredictable. The necessity of a strategic management of technology (as one of the main dimensions of ecosystems) is a “new” topic expressed in the latest contributions from service and service innovation literature (mostly in service-dominant logic research), which involves the introduction of a research agenda [15,16] to be addressed. Moreover, it seems that the key drivers leading to innovation through value co-creation are not explored sufficiently in extant research. In a co-creation-based view, processes of (co-)innovation [17] that foster the constant renewal of knowledge should be managed to handle the constant emergence of new value [18]. For this reason, the work advances a strategic framework that defines the drivers toward managing co-created innovation from the early stages of delivery and throughout the different contexts in which actors are embedded (micro, meso, and macro [3,19]). The aim is to explore how management can foster the continuous generation of new knowledge and co-creation of value through ICT-enabled interactions that can lead to service improvement and innovation [12,20]. A synthesis “meta”-perspective is introduced to investigate the emergence of economic (micro), social (meso), and environmental (macro) values toward the development of sustainability. By proposing a strategic conceptualization of value co-creation, the current work lays the theoretical foundations for the elaboration of a systems approach to the management of value co-creation and innovation. Additionally, the definition of the drivers for the harmonization of ICT-enabled co-creation can contribute to improving managers’ and scholars’ understanding of (1) the enablers of value co-creation and innovation; (2) the mechanisms leading to the outputs (mainly new knowledge) of exchanges to knowledge renewal and the continuous production of innovation in the economic and social system. The work advances a conceptual framework that identifies the main dimensions that managers should evaluate to encourage value co-creation as a key lever for innovation emergence. To reach this goal, the paper seeks to answer the following research questions: RQ1 (co-innovation): Which are the main enabling dimensions of value co-created innovation in service ecosystems? RQ2 (sustainable innovation): Which are the strategic drivers to foster the emergence of sustainable innovation at a micro-, meso-, and macro-level and manage value co-creation (at a meta-level)? The theoretical framework is assessed empirically through a case study that explores the main management strategies for value co-creation and sustainability realized by Palm an Italian company that is considered a best practice in the design, production, and delivery of wood pallets. The findings of the empirical research reveal that the optimization and strategic management of value co-creation can help organizations to gain sustainability in the long run: therefore, the transition from innovation (of technology, products, service) to sustainable innovation (economic and social development, renewal of culture and social rules, environmental eco-sustainability) can be hypothesized.
一、介绍<br>数字化对业务流程的影响促使市场转变为基于不可重复的价值共同创造过程的复杂网络,这些过程可以产生新的或改进的产品、服务和关系模式 [1]。由于互动、价值共创和创新[2] 之间的联系,服务研究建议采用一种超越性的观点,探索技术和 ICT(信息和通信技术)对服务改进和新事物的影响。服务开发 [3,4]。特别是,通过引入服务生态系统的概念,服务主导逻辑(SD 逻辑,[5-7])包含一个系统视角,将服务理解为参与参与者之间资源整合的粘合剂,通过一系列 ICT 支持互动,可以导致价值共创和创新。因此,现有的研究逐步推进了分析以技术为中介的交流如何导致价值共同创造 [8]、幸福感提升 [9,10] 和创新 [11,12] 的需求,这些创新可以产生长期的可持续性。运行 [13,14]。<br>然而,服务交换的不断发展和涌现的性质增加了价值共创协调和管理的复杂性和不确定性,变得越来越不可预测。技术战略管理的必要性(作为生态系统的主要维度之一)是服务和服务创新文献(主要是服务主导逻辑研究)的最新贡献中表达的一个“新”主题,其中涉及引入一个研究议程 [15,16] 待解决。此外,在现有的研究中似乎没有充分探索通过价值共同创造导致创新的关键驱动因素。在基于共同创造的观点中,应管理促进知识不断更新的(共同)创新过程 [17],以应对不断出现的新价值 [18]。出于这个原因,这项工作提出了一个战略框架,该框架定义了从交付的早期阶段以及在参与者嵌入的不同背景(微观、中观和宏观 [3,19])中管理共同创造创新的驱动因素。目的是探索管理层如何通过可导致服务改进和创新的 ICT 交互来促进新知识的持续生成和价值的共同创造 [12,20]。引入了综合的“元”视角来研究经济(微观)、社会(中观)和环境(宏观)价值观对可持续性发展的出现。通过提出价值共创的战略概念,目前的工作为制定价值共创和创新管理的系统方法奠定了理论基础。此外,对 ICT 支持的共同创造的协调驱动因素的定义有助于提高管理者和学者对(1)价值共同创造和创新的推动因素的理解;(2) 经济社会系统中导致知识更新和创新不断产生的交流输出(主要是新知识)的机制。这项工作提出了一个概念框架,该框架确定了管理者应该评估的主要维度,以鼓励价值共同创造作为创新出现的关键杠杆。为实现这一目标,本文试图回答以下研究问题:RQ1(联合创新):服务生态系统中价值共创创新的主要支持维度是哪些?RQ2(可持续创新):在微观、中观和宏观层面促进可持续创新的出现并管理价值共创(在元层面)的战略驱动因素是什么?该理论框架通过案例研究进行实证评估,该案例研究探索了 Palm 实现的价值共创和可持续性的主要管理策略,该公司被认为是木托盘设计、生产和交付方面的最佳实践。实证研究的结果表明,价值共创的优化和战略管理可以帮助组织获得长期的可持续性:因此,从创新(技术、产品、
正在翻译中..
1.介绍<br>数字化对业务流程的影响促使市场转型为基于不可重复的价值共同创造流程的复杂网络,从而产生新的或改进的产品、服务和关系模式[1]。由于互动、价值共同创造和创新产生之间的联系[2],服务研究提出采用超越性的观点,探索技术和ICT(信息和通信技术)对服务改进和新服务开发的影响[3,4]。特别是,通过引入服务生态系统的概念,服务主导逻辑(S-D逻辑[5–7])包含了一个系统视角,该视角将服务理解为参与参与者之间资源整合的粘合剂,通过一系列ICT支持的交互,可导致价值共同创造和创新。因此,现有研究逐步推进了分析技术中介交换如何导致价值共同创造[8]、幸福感提升[9,10]和创新[11,12]的需求,这些创新可以产生长期可持续性[13,14]。<br>然而,服务交换的演变和涌现性质增加了价值共同创造的协调和管理的复杂性和不确定性,这变得越来越不可预测。技术战略管理的必要性(作为生态系统的主要维度之一)是服务和服务创新文献(主要是服务主导逻辑研究)最新贡献中表达的一个“新”主题,其中包括引入待解决的研究议程[15,16]。此外,现有研究似乎没有充分探讨通过价值共同创造实现创新的关键驱动因素。从基于共同创造的观点来看,促进知识不断更新的(共同)创新过程[17]应加以管理,以应对不断出现的新价值[18]。因此,该工作提出了一个战略框架,该框架定义了从交付的早期阶段到参与者嵌入的不同环境(微观、中观和宏观[3,19])中管理共同创造创新的驱动因素。目的是探索管理层如何通过ICT互动促进新知识的不断产生和价值的共同创造,从而促进服务改进和创新[12,20]。引入综合“元”视角来研究经济(微观)、社会(中观)和环境(宏观)价值观对可持续发展的影响。通过提出价值共同创造的战略概念,目前的工作为制定价值共同创造和创新管理的系统方法奠定了理论基础。此外,定义协调ICT促成的共同创造的驱动因素有助于提高管理者和学者对(1)价值共同创造和创新的促成因素的理解;(2) 导致交流产出(主要是新知识)的机制,有助于经济和社会体系中的知识更新和创新的持续生产。这项工作提出了一个概念框架,确定了管理者应评估的主要维度,以鼓励价值共同创造,作为创新涌现的关键杠杆。为了实现这一目标,本文试图回答以下研究问题:RQ1(共同创新):服务生态系统中价值共同创造创新的主要促成维度是什么?RQ2(可持续创新):在微观、中观和宏观层面促进可持续创新的出现以及管理价值共同创造(在元层面)的战略驱动因素是什么?理论框架通过一个案例研究进行实证评估,该案例研究探索了Palm(一家意大利公司)实现的价值共同创造和可持续性的主要管理战略,Palm被认为是木托盘设计、生产和交付的最佳实践。实证研究的结果表明,价值共同创造的优化和战略管理可以帮助组织获得长期可持续性:因此,从创新(技术、产品、服务)到可持续创新的过渡(经济和社会发展、文化和社会规则的更新、环境生态可持续性)可以假设。
正在翻译中..