美国语言学家尤金•奈达提出了功能对等理论。这一理论首先被表述为“形式对

The American linguist Eugene Nida proposed the functional equivalence theory. This theory was first expressed as "formal equivalence", which requires the original and translation to be consistent in form. Nida believes that translators should try their best to achieve form equivalence while paying attention to content equivalence and information equivalence. Subsequently, in "Explorations in Translation Science", Nida transformed "dynamic equivalence" into "functional equivalence". Nida believes that functional equivalence means that the response of the readers to the translation is basically the same as the response of the readers of the original text to the original text. He pointed out that "translation is the reproduction of information from the source language from semantics to style in the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language".

American linguist Eugene Nida put forward the theory of functional equivalence. This theory is first expressed as "formal equivalence", which requires the formal consistency between the original text and the translation. Nida believes that while paying attention to content equivalence and information equivalence, translators should also try their best to achieve formal equivalence. Then, in the exploration of translation science, Nida transformed "dynamic equivalence" into "functional equivalence". Nida believes that functional equivalence is that the reader's response to the translation is basically the same as that of the original reader. He pointed out that "translation is to reproduce the information of the source language from semantics to style in the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language".

Eugene Nida, an American linguist, put forward the theory of functional equivalence. This theory is first expressed as "formal equivalence", that is, it requires the original text and the translated text to be consistent in form. Nida believes that translators should try their best to achieve formal equivalence while paying attention to content equivalence and information equivalence. Subsequently, in Exploration of Translation Science, Nida transformed "dynamic equivalence" into "functional equivalence". Nida believes that functional equivalence means that the reader's response to the target text is basically the same as that of the original text. He pointed out that "translation is to reproduce the information of the source language from semantics to style in the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language".