Enclosinglandforgreaterefficiencyandproductiondidnotproduceany negative side effects on those who continued to draw upon the material goods of the commons.Their collective well-being was intact because there was more than enough land for everyone. Locke continues to reinforce his argument bysaying: ‘There was never the less left for others because of his enclosure for himself; for he that leaves as much as another can make use of does as good as take nothing at all’.