“一种会话含义的存在必须能够被推导出来。”[1]这是格赖斯曾说过的一句

"The existence of a conversational meaning must be able to be deduced." [1] This is a sentence Grice once said. In Grice's view, conversational meaning can actually be perceived by intuition, but once this intuition cannot be replaced by an argument, this meaning cannot be regarded as conversational meaning. In our daily communication, there is often such a phenomenon: in order to express some of his intentions, the speaker often deliberately violates a certain criterion in the principle of cooperation, if the listener wants to quickly understand what the speaker is The conversational meaning of speaking words needs to be deduced based on one's own understanding of the words. First, each word has its own statutory meaning that does not depend on context or other background knowledge. This statutory meaning may be a collection of multiple meanings. Secondly, if we encounter when we cannot confirm whether the speaker complies with the conversational principle when analyzing the discourse, first assume that the speaker complies with the general principle of the cooperative principle at least. After that, it combines context and related background knowledge to analyze the utterance by integrating the speaker’s intentions to further understand the true meaning of the utterances spoken by the speaker. In this process, the listener must always assume that the speaker complies with the general principle of cooperation. At the same time, when the speaker speaks some words with conversational meaning, he also assumes that the listener has the ability to infer the true meaning of the words he speaks based on his own background knowledge and analysis level. In Grice's view, it is far from enough to rely on intuition to analyze the meaning of conversation. At the same time, a rigorous derivation is required. This derivation should be a generalized model. Grice explained the general derivation model of conversational meaning as follows: "The speaker speaks the words P. The listener believes that the speaker will not be uncooperative for no reason; unless the illocutionary meaning the speaker is trying to convey is Q, otherwise. He cannot abide by the principle of cooperation, which leads to the interruption of communication; the speaker already knows that the listener will understand the meaning of what he is saying as Q; the speaker does not prevent the listener from understanding it as Q, expecting or at least allowing the listener to understand It is Q; therefore, the conversational meaning of the speaker is Q.” The listener derives the conversational meaning of the utterance through the analysis of the cooperative principle. In order to explain the detailed derivation process of the conversational meaning, the author will give a few examples. In these examples, there are indeed varying degrees of violation of a certain criterion in the cooperative principle, but the listener has the right to assume that what the speaker says is implied on the basis of observing the cooperative principle. From this, the listener can smoothly deduce the conversational meaning implied by the speaker's words

"The existence of a conversational meaning must be able to be deduced." This is a word that Grace once said. In Grice's view, the meaning of conversation can actually be perceived by intuition, but once such intuition cannot be replaced by an argument, this meaning cannot be regarded as conversational meaning. In our life communication, there is often the phenomenon that the speaker in order to express some of his intentions, the words often deliberately violate a certain principle of cooperation, if the obedient wants to quickly understand the conversational meaning of the speaker's words, it needs to be combined with his own understanding of the discourse to derive. First, each word itself has its own statute meaning that does not depend on context or other background knowledge, and this statute meaning may be a collection of multiple meanings. Second, if we meet in the analysis of discourse that cannot confirm whether the speaker adheres to the principle of conversation, we assume that the speaker is at least committed to the general principle of cooperation. After that, combined with context and related background knowledge, the speaker's intention is integrated to analyze the discourse, in order to further understand the true meaning of the speaker's words. In this process, the obedient always assumes that the speaker adheres to the general principle of cooperation. At the same time, when the speaker uttered certain words with conversational meaning, he also assumed that the listener had the ability to guess the true meaning of the words he said according to his background knowledge and analytical level. In Grice's view, it is far from enough to rely solely on a grasp of intuition to dissect the meaning of a conversation, but also requires a rigorous derivation, which should be a general model. Grice explains the general derivation mode of the meaning of the conversation as follows: "The speaker speaks the words P the listener believes that the speaker will not be unprovoked and uncooperative; , which leads to the interruption of communication; the speaker's heart is already clear that the listener will understand the meaning of what he is saying as Q; the speaker does not prevent the listener from understanding as Q, expecting or at least allowing the listener to understand as Q; and therefore, the speaker's conversational meaning is Q. "The listener deduces the conversational meaning of discourse through the analysis of the principle of cooperation, and the detailed derivation process for the progressive interpretation of the meaning of the conversation, and the author will give several examples, although there are indeed different degrees of violation of a certain principle in the principle of cooperation in these examples, but the listener has the right to assume that what the speaker's words imply is based on adherence to the principle of cooperation." The listener can thus successfully derive the conversational meaning implied by the speaker's words

"The existence of a conversational meaning must be able to be derived." [1] This is a word Grice once said. In Grice's view, conversational meaning can be perceived by intuition. But once this intuition cannot be replaced by an argument, it cannot be regarded as conversational meaning. In our life communication, there are often such phenomena: in order to express some intention, the speaker often deliberately violates a certain criterion in the principle of cooperation. If the listener wants to quickly understand the meaning of the conversation, it is necessary to combine his own understanding of the discourse to deduce. First, each word has its own meaning which does not depend on the context or other background knowledge. This kind of meaning may be a collection of multiple meanings. Secondly, if we meet the problem that the speaker is unable to confirm whether the speaker complies with the conversational principle, we should assume that the speaker should at least observe the general principle of cooperation. Then, combining the context and relevant background knowledge, the author combines the intention of the speaker to analyze the discourse, so as to understand the real meaning of the speaker. In this process, the listener always assumes that the speaker is in compliance with the general principle of cooperation. At the same time, when the speaker speaks some conversational words, it is assumed that the listener can infer the true meaning of his or her speech according to his background knowledge and analysis level. In Grice's view, it is far from enough to analyze the meaning of conversation by relying on the grasp of intuition, and it also needs to be a rigorous derivation, which should be a general model. Grice, a general derivation model of conversational meaning, is explained as follows: "the speaker speaks the discourse P, and the listener thinks that the speaker will not cooperate without any reason; unless the speaker tries to convey the meaning of Q, Otherwise, he can not abide by the principle of cooperation, which leads to the interruption of communication; the speaker has already understood the meaning of what he said as Q; the speaker does not prevent the listener from understanding Q, expecting or at least allowing the listener to understand Q; therefore, the conversational meaning of the speaker is Q. " The listener deduces the conversational meaning of discourse through the analysis of cooperative principle. In order to explain the detailed derivation process of conversational meaning, the author will give examples. Although there are some violations of certain rules in the principle of cooperation in different degrees, the listener has the right to assume that the implied things of the speaker's speech are based on the principle of cooperation. Thus, the listener can deduce the conversational meaning implied by the speaker's speech smoothly<br>