Suppose a interviewer has a new and unique answer to a question, but the answer is not the same as a standard and was judged unqualified robot, that does not cause a great deal of unfair
Suppose an interviewer has a novel and unique answer to a question, but because it is not the same as the standard answer, the robot is judged unqualified, that does not cause great unfairness ...
Assuming that an interviewer has a novel and unique answer to a question, but is judged unqualified by a robot because it is different from the standard answer, that would cause great injustice.<BR>