对比计算结果，由齿面接触疲劳强度计算的模数m略大于齿根弯曲疲劳强度计算

Comparing the calculation results, the modulus m calculated from the contact fatigue strength of the tooth surface is slightly greater than the modulus calculated from the bending fatigue strength of the tooth root. Because the size of the gear modulus m is mainly determined by the bearing capacity determined by the bending strength, the contact fatigue of the tooth surface The bearing capacity determined by the strength is only related to the diameter. The modulus calculated from the bending strength is 4.86mm, the nearest rounded to 5mm, and the circle diameter is calculated according to the contact strength:

Comparing the calculation results, the module m calculated by the flank contact fatigue intensity is slightly larger than the die calculated by the root bending fatigue intensity, because the size of the gear module m mainly depends on the carrying capacity determined by the bending intensity, and the carrying capacity determined by the flank contact fatigue intensity is only related to the diameter, it is desirable to calculate the module number 4.86mm by bending strength, near the circle is round to 5mm, according to the contact intensity to calculate the score circle diameter:

Compared with the calculation results, the modulus m calculated by the tooth surface contact fatigue strength is slightly larger than that calculated by the tooth root bending fatigue strength. Because the gear modulus m mainly depends on the bearing capacity determined by the bending strength, and the bearing capacity determined by the tooth surface contact fatigue strength is only related to the diameter, the modulus m calculated by the bending strength can be 4.86mm, rounded to 5mm, Calculate the diameter of score circle according to the contact strength:<br>