总疗效比较：①总有效率：在疗程结束及随访时三组之间无差异（P＞0.05

Total Efficacy Comparison: <br>① total efficiency: at the end of treatment and follow-up no difference (P> 0.05) between the three groups. <br>② penetrance treatment: after treatment, combined with acupuncture effect equivalent group (P> 0.05), but were higher than SET group (P <0.01, P <0.05 ); follow-up, acupuncture group and the combination group SET high group (P <0.05), but rather acupuncture group and sET group (P> 0.05).

Total efficacy comparison:<br>(1) Total efficiency: there is no difference between the three groups at the end of the course of treatment and follow-up (P.05).<br>(2) Treatment rate: after the treatment, the combined group and the needle group effect is equivalent (P.0.05), but higher than the SET group (P 0.01, P 0.05);

Total effect comparison:<br>① Total effective rate: there was no difference between the three groups at the end of treatment and follow-up (P > 0.05).<br>② Treatment and display rate: after the course of treatment, the effect of the combined group was similar to that of the acupuncture group (P > 0.05), but higher than that of the set group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05); during the follow-up, the combined group was higher than that of the acupuncture group and the set group (P < 0.05), while the acupuncture group was similar to the set group (P > 0.05).