（一）以起源作为切入点进行分析：语言和思维二者并不是同源的事物，前者源

(A) as an entry point to the origin were analyzed: both the language and thinking things are not homologous, social learning from the former, while the latter is derived from the action. It is not difficult to see, mainly because the former produce experience, while the latter produces mainly from actions taken by individual things. From the time of the origin point of view, time appears thinking is undoubtedly precedes language, thinking activities can produce some control over the activities of the language. Note, however, that thinking is not the same language, can not be attributed to the language, but it can not be explained by the depth of the language.

(i) Analysis with origin as an entry point: language and thinking are not homogeneity, the former is from social learning, and the latter is derived from action. It is not difficult to see that the former is mainly due to experience, while the latter is mainly due to the individual's action on things. From the origin of the time, the appearance of thinking is undoubtedly before the language, so the activity of thinking can have a certain control of language activities. However, it should be noted that thinking is not the same as language, nor can it be summed up as language, let alone deeply interpreted by language.

(1) starting from the origin: language and thinking are not homologous things, the former is from social learning, the latter is from action. It is not hard to see that the former is mainly due to experience, while the latter is mainly due to the actions taken by individuals. From the perspective of the origin time, the emergence time of thinking is undoubtedly prior to language, so the activities of thinking can have a certain control over the activities of language. However, it should be noted that thinking is not equivalent to language, nor can it be summed up as language, nor can it be interpreted in depth through language.<br>