方法：选取来本院进行腹腔镜根治术治疗的结直肠癌患者80例作为研究对象，

Methods: examples to hospital at 80 subjects were randomly divided into test group and control group, 40 cases of colorectal cancer treatment in laparoscopic radical. The control group using conventional treatment methods, the test group using conventional methods evidence-based nursing care basis; two groups were compared VAS, SDS, SAS scores and QLQ-C30 scoring.

Methods: 80 cases of colorectal cancer patients who were treated for laparoscopic therapy were selected as study objects, and were randomly divided into two groups, each group of 40 cases, divided into two groups of trial and control. The control group adopted the method of conventional nursing, and the experimental group adopted evidence-based nursing method on the basis of routine nursing, and compared the VAS, SDS, SAS score and QLQ-C30 score of the two groups of patients.

Methods: 80 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated by laparoscopic radical surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group and control group, 40 cases in each group. The control group adopted the method of routine nursing, the experimental group adopted the method of evidence-based nursing on the basis of routine nursing; the vas, SDS, SAS scores and QLQ-C30 scores of the two groups were compared.