对多目标的柔性作业车间调度问题求解,往往不存在唯一的全局最优解,而是求得一组互不支配的pareto最优解集。传统的求解方法是采用线性加权策略的英语翻译

对多目标的柔性作业车间调度问题求解,往往不存在唯一的全局最优解,而是求

对多目标的柔性作业车间调度问题求解,往往不存在唯一的全局最优解,而是求得一组互不支配的pareto最优解集。传统的求解方法是采用线性加权策略将多目标问题转化成单目标问题[4],例如,Gonzalez M A[5],Ceylan Z[6]通过线性加权方法来实现调度过程中生产成本最小、碳排放最低等目标。但各目标的权重系数合理性还有待改善,因而限制了该方法对一些多目标问题的有效处理。此外,随着多目标优化问题的规模不断扩大,分支界定法、整数规划法、枚举法等[7,8]精确求解方法往往无能为力,或者相当耗时。随着人工智能技术的发展,目前通常借鉴社会群体行为,广泛地采用群智能优化求解方法,如遗传算法,蜂群算法,蚁群算法、免疫算法、粒子群算法[9,10]等。Gong[11]等人采用混合人工蜂群算法来解决考虑人工因素的柔性车间作业调度问题,Shen[12]等人对分别采用遗传算法、模拟退火和蚁群优化来解决总生产时间最小问题的性能进行了比较分析;Ding[13]等人通过改进的粒子群优化算法求解柔性车间调度中的最大完工时间最小问题。
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (英语) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
To solve the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem, there is often no unique global optimal solution, but a set of non-dominant pareto optimal solutions. The traditional solution method is to use a linear weighting strategy to transform a multi-objective problem into a single-objective problem [4], for example, Gonzalez MA [5], Ceylan Z [6] use linear weighting methods to minimize production costs and carbon emissions in the scheduling process. Minimum goal. However, the rationality of the weight coefficients of each target needs to be improved, which limits the effective treatment of some multi-target problems with this method. In addition, with the continuous expansion of the scale of multi-objective optimization problems, accurate solution methods such as branch and bound method, integer programming method, enumeration method, etc. are often incapable or time-consuming. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, it is currently common to learn from the behavior of social groups and widely use swarm intelligence optimization solutions, such as genetic algorithm, bee colony algorithm, ant colony algorithm, immune algorithm, particle swarm algorithm [9,10], etc. Gong [11] and others used a hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm to solve the problem of flexible workshop scheduling considering artificial factors, and Shen [12] and others used genetic algorithm, simulated annealing and ant colony optimization to solve the problem of minimum total production time. The performance was compared and analyzed; Ding [13] et al. solved the problem of minimum completion time in flexible workshop scheduling through an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
For solving the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem, there is often no unique global optimal solution, but a set of non dominated Pareto optimal solutions. The traditional solution method is to use the linear weighting strategy to transform the multi-objective problem into a single objective problem [4]. For example, Gonzalez Ma [5], Ceylan Z [6] uses the linear weighting method to achieve the objectives of minimizing production cost and carbon emission in the scheduling process. However, the rationality of the weight coefficient of each objective needs to be improved, which limits the effective treatment of some multi-objective problems by this method. In addition, with the continuous expansion of the scale of multi-objective optimization problems, branch definition method, integer programming method, enumeration method and other [7,8] accurate solution methods are often powerless or quite time-consuming. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, at present, swarm intelligence optimization methods are widely used based on social group behavior, such as genetic algorithm, bee colony algorithm, ant colony algorithm, immune algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm [9,10]. Gong [11] et al. Used hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm to solve the flexible job shop scheduling problem considering human factors, and Shen [12] et al. Compared and analyzed the performance of genetic algorithm, simulated annealing and ant colony optimization to solve the problem of minimum total production time respectively; Ding [13] et al. Solved the problem of minimizing the maximum completion time in flexible job shop scheduling through an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm.<br>
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
When solving the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem, there is usually no unique global optimal solution, but a set of pareto optimal solutions which are not dominated by each other. Traditional solution method is to use linear weighting strategy to transform multi-objective problem into single-objective problem [4]. For example, Gonzalez M A[5] and Ceylan Z[6] use linear weighting method to achieve the goals of minimum production cost and minimum carbon emission in the scheduling process. However, the rationality of the weight coefficient of each objective needs to be improved, which limits the effectiveness of this method in dealing with some multi-objective problems. In addition, with the expanding scale of multi-objective optimization problems, accurate solutions such as branch definition method, integer programming method and enumeration method [7,8] are often powerless or time consuming. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, swarm intelligence optimization methods, such as genetic algorithm, bee colony algorithm, ant colony algorithm, immune algorithm, particle swarm algorithm [9,10], are widely used. Gong[11] et al. used the hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm to solve the flexible job shop scheduling problem considering artificial factors, and Shen[12] et al. compared and analyzed the performance of genetic algorithm, simulated annealing and ant colony optimization respectively to solve the problem of minimum total production time. Ding[13] et al. solved the problem of minimum maximum completion time in flexible job shop scheduling by improved particle swarm optimization algorithm.
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: