Second, the chaotic text pointedly

Second, the chaotic text pointedly invites our participation and acknowledges our involvement in the meaning we derive from it. It compels the writerly reading that Roland Barthes idealizes: The writerly text is a perpetual present, upon which no consequent  language (which would inevitably make it past) can be superimposed; the writerly text is ourselves writing , before the infinite play of the world (the world as function) is traversed, intersected, stopped, plasticized by some singular system (Ideology, Genus, Criticism) which reduces the plurality of entrances, the opening of networks, the infinity of languages.80I would add the caveat that these “entrances” lead to the basin of attraction. There may be an infinite number of interpretations of a particular text, but they all fall within a bounded area.