摘要：本文对共时平面上“但凡是”“大凡是”之间以及二者内部几种同形异构

Abstract: The total of the upper plane "Where the" "Any large" differences between the two and between the internal sort several isomerism, Analysis, that: when a range for adverb, "but all" and " As long as (to) "multiple usage table defined conditions. "Any large" and "all (both)" multiple usage table clustering omnibus. "But who," as well as the use of conjunctions, table "if." "Great whatevers" There modal adverbs, table speaker predicted. The syntax of both the motivation, and degree of different paths. Formation as a reference pigment "whenever" "Generally", induce the former syntax of cross-layer recombination mechanism, semantic contamination; the latter is the syntax of the mechanisms inducing the like reparse position, semantic extension. Both the syntax of the process are accompanied by significant subjective. "But all" and "big whatevers" the last track evolution also vary. <BR>Key words: but all; great all; structure; semantics; grammaticalization; Origin

Abstract: This paper combs and analyzes the differences between "but all" and "big" and the differences between several conjugated isomorphisms within the common time plane, and thinks that: when making range adverbs, "but all" of "as long as (on) " usage, table conditions are limited. "All(all) " of "DaFan" is used in many ways, and table classes are clustered. "But "but "what' also has the conjunction usage, the table "if". "Dafan" also has the use of tone adverbs, the speaker predicts. The grammatical drivers, paths and degrees are different. As the "but everything" and "dafan" of the parameterlex, the mechanism that induces the grammaticalization of the former is cross-layer reorganization and semantic contamination, and the mechanism that induces the grammaticalization of the latter is the re-analysis and semantic generalization on the form. In the process of grammar, both are accompanied by the subjectivity of meaning.<BR>But the evolution trajectory of "but everything" and "da fan" is also different. Keywords: but everything; dahas; structure; semantics; grammatical; source-to-explore

Absrtact: This paper combs and differentiates the differences between "Danshi" and "Dashi" on the synchronic plane and several isomorphic and heterogeneous words in them. It is believed that when used as scope adverbs, "Danshi" is used in many ways and its conditions are limited. There are many usages of "all (all)" of "all things", and the categories of "all things" are generalized. There are also conjunctions in the form of "if". "Da Fan Shi" also has the use of mood adverbs, which the speaker predicts. The motivation, path and degree of grammaticalization are different between them. As a paramorpheme, "Danfan" and "Dafan" induce the grammaticalization of the former through cross-layer reorganization and semantic contamination, while the grammaticalization mechanism of the latter is the reanalysis and semantic generalization of adverbials. Both of them are accompanied by the subjectification of meaning in the process of grammaticalization. The diachronic evolutionary trajectories of "everything" and "everything" are also different.<BR>Key words: everything; everything; structure; semantics; grammaticalization; source exploration<BR>