本研究主要采用了实验研究法。教学实验持续了三个月左右,在英语教师和学生中实施。分为前测和后测两个阶段。写作考试总分 15 分,作文考试要求 的英语翻译

本研究主要采用了实验研究法。教学实验持续了三个月左右,在英语教师和学生

本研究主要采用了实验研究法。教学实验持续了三个月左右,在英语教师和学生中实施。分为前测和后测两个阶段。写作考试总分 15 分,作文考试要求 30 分钟完成。实验开始前,实验班和控制班的学生在规定的时间内完成写作考试,考试作文来自期中考试的写作部分。测试完就严格按照中考评分标准对学生的作文进行评分。对前测的结果进行仔细记录和分析,看两个班的英语写作水平是否相同或相近。实验过程中,词块教学法被应用在实验班中,而控制班则采用传统的写作教学法。为保证实验结果的准确性,除教学方法不同外,使用的教材和教师等均相同。在实验的最后,学生们还要进行期末考试的写作测试。最后的测试评分还是与前测的方法一致。并对所得结果进行分析比较,包括与EC前测、EC后测和CC后测的结果进行比较。同时也可以看到词块教学法在英语写作教学中的作用。
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (英语) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
This research mainly uses experimental research methods. The teaching experiment lasted about three months and was implemented among English teachers and students. It is divided into two stages: pre-test and post-test. The total score of the writing test is 15 points, and the composition test requires 30 minutes to complete. Before the start of the experiment, students in the experimental class and the control class completed the writing test within the specified time. The test composition comes from the writing part of the mid-term exam. After the test, students’ essays will be graded in strict accordance with the senior high school entrance examination grading standards. Carefully record and analyze the results of the pre-test to see if the English writing level of the two classes is the same or similar. During the experiment, the lexical block teaching method was used in the experimental class, while the control class used the traditional writing teaching method. In order to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, except for the different teaching methods, the textbooks and teachers used are the same. At the end of the experiment, students have to take a writing test for the final exam. The final test score is still consistent with the previous test method. The results are analyzed and compared, including comparison with the results of EC pre-test, EC post-test and CC post-test. At the same time, we can also see the role of lexical block method in the teaching of English writing.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
The experimental research method is mainly used in this study. The teaching experiment lasted about three months and was carried out among English teachers and students. It is divided into two stages: pre-test and post-test. The writing exam has a total score of 15 points, and the composition exam requires 30 minutes to complete. Before the experiment began, the students in the experimental and control classes completed the writing exam within the allotted time, and the composition came from the writing part of the mid-term exam. After the test, the students' compositions are rated strictly according to the test scoring criteria. The results of the pre-test are carefully recorded and analyzed to see if the English writing levels of the two classes are the same or similar. In the course of experiment, the word block teaching method is applied in the experimental class, while the control class uses the traditional writing teaching method. In order to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, except for different teaching methods, the use of teaching materials and teachers are the same. At the end of the experiment, the students also have to take the writing test for the final exam. The final test score is still consistent with the method of the previous test. The results are analyzed and compared, including those of EC pre-test, EC post-test and CC post-test. At the same time, we can also see the role of word block teaching in English writing teaching.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
This study mainly adopts the experimental research method. The experiment lasted about three months and was carried out among English teachers and students. It is divided into pre-test and post test. The total score of the writing test is 15, and the writing test requires 30 minutes. Before the beginning of the experiment, the students in the experimental class and the control class completed the writing test within the specified time. The test compositions were from the writing part of the mid-term exam. After the test, the students' compositions will be scored in strict accordance with the scoring standard of the senior high school entrance examination. The results of the pretest are carefully recorded and analyzed to see if the two classes have the same or similar English writing level. During the experiment, the lexical approach was applied in the experimental class, while the traditional writing approach was used in the control class. In order to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, except for different teaching methods, the use of teaching materials and teachers are the same. At the end of the experiment, the students also have a writing test for the final exam. The final test score is consistent with the pre-test method. The results were compared with those of EC pre-test, EC post test and CC post test. At the same time, we can see the role of lexical approach in English writing teaching.<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: