Table 1 shows that distribution of

Table 1 shows that distribution of the data is in acceptable ranges. Yet, it appears to be a bitnegatively skewed regarding all values accept the one about loneliness, and curtosis values aboutattachment to school and teachers are bit high. Yet, it is claimed that as the research sample is big enough(N= 100 for positive skewness and N= 200 for positive skewness), little deviations in a distribution doesnot cause significant differences in the analysis. Tabachnick and Fidell (2001) suggest taking the shapeof distribution (histogram) into account as the sample is big enough. Even though it is a bit peaked,histogram proves normality of the data set.Means and standard deviations of school attachment and loneliness scores for each bully statusare displayed in table 2.Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations for School Attachment and Loneliness Scores ofEach Bully Status