Descriptionprocess 121 which should be a very secure process. The worker preforming the gouging has not gotten to the bottom of the weld, and have not removed the entire mistake, Therefore there are still welding mistakes in the weld, and that are found when another NDT is performed on the repair welding afterward. Some defect location for 3rd repair was not found in 1st and 2nd repair informationRoot cause1. The gouging depth was not enough to reach 5mm deeper than the position of the defects, and MT(or PT) was not performed to check if the defects were removed. The gouging edge didn’t go with an opening and angle, which caused it hard for welders to weld and clean weld interpass.2. CSMC didn’t record the length of the defects properly. If the adjacent defects are within 50mm, they shall be combined and viewed as a defect.Improvements1. CSMC will record and combine the defects within 50mm2. The supervisors shall explain the repair details to relevant welders, grinders on daily toolbox meeting, and related procedures shall be put on site for reference.3. The defects shall be record per weld plan, and use “Repair Map” to identify the repair position and times. Please check attachment for details.
描述。<br>過程121,這應該是一個非常安全的過程。預加工的挖槽工人尚未到焊縫底部,也未消除整個錯誤,因此焊縫中仍有焊接錯誤,並且後來在維修焊接時發現另一個 NDT。在第一次和第二次維修資訊中未找到第三次維修的一些缺陷位置。<br><br>根源。<br>1. 挖氣深度不足達到比缺陷位置深 5mm,並且未執行 MT(或 PT)檢查缺陷是否被清除。挖氣邊緣沒有開口和角度,導致焊工難以焊接和清潔焊縫中間通道。<br>2. CSMC 沒有正確記錄缺陷的長度。如果連續缺陷在 50mm 範圍內,則應組合它們並視為缺陷。<br><br>改進。<br>1. CSMC 將在 50mm 內記錄並合併缺陷。<br>2. 主管人員應當在日常工具箱會議上向有關焊工、磨床說明維修細節,相關程式應放在現場參考。<br>3. 缺陷應記錄每個焊接計劃,並使用"維修圖"確定維修位置和時間。請查看附件瞭解詳情。
正在翻译中..