53. Satco restates and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1through 48 above.54. Satco has not infringed and does not infringe the ’529 patent directly or indirectly,either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, for at least the reasons specifically set forthabove.55. There is an actual controversy, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and§ 2202, between Satco and UC concerning the non-infringement of the ’529 patent.