The Range of the EZ-Fluo™ method can be compared to the Range of the t的简体中文翻译

The Range of the EZ-Fluo™ method ca

The Range of the EZ-Fluo™ method can be compared to the Range of the traditional method.
If it is not possible to determine the Range of the EZ-Fluo™ method, verify that the conditions of Accuracy, Precision and Linearity were met.
EZ-Fluo™ Method Specificity
The EZ-Fluo™ method is specific to viable micro-organisms such as bacteria, yeasts and molds.
The Specificity of EZ-Fluo™ method can be established from the data recovered during the Incubation Time Robustness and Accuracy tests where several micro-organism species were tested.
To demonstrate the EZ-Fluo™ method’s Specificity it is possible to screen the method with the appropriate test micro-organisms.
Several replicates should be carried out for each microorganism.
These tests conditions are covered by the Incubation Time Robustness test, as well as the Accuracy test, where several micro-organisms were challenged.
In these tests the EZ-Fluo™ method is tested in parallel with the traditional method, and microbial recovery is calculated for each micro-organism tested.
Incubation Time Robustness demonstrates that the micro-organisms tested are successfully detected and recovery of the micro-organisms is assessed.
Accuracy test demonstrates that the microorganisms tested are successfully detected and recovery percentage shows closeness of the EZ- Fluo™ results to the traditional Method results.
It is possible to use Appendix 13:Comment Sheet, to document the list of the micro-organisms tested and successfully detected with the EZ-Fluo™ method.
The Specificity of the EZ-Fluo™ method is assessed if all test micro-organisms are successfully detected, where conditions of Robustness, Accuracy, Precision and Linearity are met.
Remark:the specificity can also be assessed from the test 6.10:Verification of the Product Absence of Interference, were different micro-organisms are tested in presence of test products.
EZ-Fluo™ Method False Positive Rate
A False Positive normally means that a test claims a sample to be positive, when it actually is not, and is evaluated where no positives are present in the samples.
An approach to evaluate the occurrence of False Positive is to consider all the negative controls(samples without micro-organism)processed during Incubation Time Robustness and Accuracy tests.
This approach enables comparing the EZ- Fluo™ method and the traditional method, as both are tested in parallel.
The Negative Controls are processed during handlings to verify that the operating conditions are aseptic, and that the method does not generate false positive result.
In case of fluorescent spot on an EZ-Fluo™ method Negative Control sample, an investigation should be carried out.
The investigation plan below is proposed:
EZ-Fluo Negative Control
Fluorescent spot
INVESTIGATION:
Re-incubation of the sample
=Real Positive result due to exogenous contamination
Note:The EZ-Fluo™ sample should be re-incubated to achieve the incubation period recommended by the relevant pharmacopeia.
The False Positive rate of the traditional method should have been determined during the traditional method validation.
If not, it is possible to use the results obtained during the present EZ-Fluo™ method validation, as both methods are tested in parallel.
If using the sampling plan proposed for Incubation Time Robustness and Accuracy test, the following numbers of Negative Controls without micro-organism are performed during each handling set with micro-organisms:
Number of Negative Controls(Per micro-organism tested)
EZ-Fluo™ Method
Incubation Time Robustness Test
Total Number of Negative Controls
In both Incubation Time Robustness and Accuracy tests, the sampling plan is proposed as an example, to test one micro-organism type.
So the more micro-organisms are tested, the more Negative Controls are processed.
These Negative Controls results should be summed, in order to determine the occurrence of false positive result.
The False Positive Rate of the EZ-Fluo™ method can be calculated as follows:
Number of False Positives Spots
The False Positive Rate of the EZ-Fluo™ method is compared to the False Positive Rate of the traditional method.
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (简体中文) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
在EZ-的Fluo™方法的范围可以比传统方法的范围。<br>如果无法确定的EZ-的Fluo™方法的范围,验证准确度的条件下,精度和线性度得到满足。<br>EZ-的Fluo™方法特异性<br>的EZ-的Fluo™方法是特定于活的微生物,如细菌,酵母和霉菌。<br>EZ-的Fluo™方法的特异性可以从其中几个微生物物种中测试,孵育时间和鲁棒性的测试精度期间恢复的数据来建立。<br>为了证明EZ-的Fluo™方法的特异性,可以筛选与适当的测试微生物的方法。<br>一些重复应该对每种微生物进行。<br>这些测试条件由培养时间稳健性检验,以及精度测试,其中一些微生物受到质疑覆盖。<br>在这些试验中的EZ-的Fluo™方法平行测试与传统的方法和微生物恢复计算用于测试的每种微生物。<br>培育时间鲁棒性证明是成功检测到所测试的微生物和微生物的恢复进行评估。<br>准确度测试表明,成功检测测试的微生物和恢复百分比显示EZ-的Fluo™结果到了传统方法的结果接近。<br>它可以使用附录13:评论表,以记录测试,并成功地与EZ-的Fluo™方法检测到的微生物的列表。<br>如果成功地检测到所有的测试微生物,其中稳健性,准确度,精确和线性的条件得到满足的EZ-的Fluo™方法的特异性进行评估。<br>备注:特异性,也可以从测试评估6.10:干扰的产品缺失的验证,是不同的微生物在测试产品存在进行测试。<br>EZ-的Fluo™方法假阳性率的<br>假阳性通常意味着测试要求的样本为阳性,当其实际上不是,并且其中没有阳性是存在于样品中被评估。<br>评价假阳性的发生的方法是考虑所有培育时间鲁棒性和精度的测试期间处理的阴性对照(样品没有微生物)。<br>这种方法使比较EZ-的Fluo™方法和传统的方法,因为这两个并行测试。<br>所述阴性对照handlings期间处理以验证该操作条件是无菌的,并且该方法不产生假阳性结果。<br>在上的EZ-的Fluo™方法阴性对照样品的荧光斑点的情况下,调查应进行。<br>下面的调查计划提出:<br>EZ-的Fluo阴性对照<br>荧光斑点<br>调查:<br>重新孵化样品<br>=真正的结果为正,由于外源性污染<br>注:EZ-的Fluo™样品应重新培养,以实现所建议的潜伏期相关的药典。<br>应传统的方法验证过程中已经确定了传统方法的假阳性率。<br>如果不是,它能够使用本EZ-的Fluo™方法验证过程中获得的结果,因为这两个方法在并行测试。<br>:如果使用提出了用于处理时间的鲁棒性和精度测试的抽样方案,阴性对照的以下数字无微生物是在每个处理组用微生物进行的<br>阴性对照的数量(每个测试微生物)<br>EZ-的Fluo™方法<br>培育时间鲁棒性试验<br>阴性对照的总数<br>在两种处理时间鲁棒性和精度的测试中,抽样方案,提出了作为一个例子,测试一个微生物类型。<br>所以更微生物进行测试,越阴性对照处理。<br>这些阴性对照结果应进行汇总,以确定的假阳性结果的发生。<br>在EZ-的Fluo™方法的假阳性率可以计算如下:<br>误报一定数量的斑点<br>的EZ-的Fluo™方法的假阳性率比传统方法的假阳性率。
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
交货后,如果你随身携带,因为手柄是附加的,它也很方便携带。 ...
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
ez fluo™方法的范围可以与传统方法的范围进行比较。<br>如果无法确定EZ-Fluo™方法的范围,请验证是否满足精度、精密度和线性条件。<br>EZ-Fluo™方法特异性<br>ez-fluo™方法是针对细菌、酵母菌和霉菌等活微生物的。<br>EZ-FLUO™方法的特异性可以从孵化时间稳健性和准确性测试(其中测试了几个微生物物种)期间恢复的数据中确定。<br>为了证明ez-fluo™方法的特异性,可以使用适当的测试微生物筛选该方法。<br>每种微生物应进行多次复制。<br>孵化时间稳健性测试和准确性测试涵盖了这些测试条件,其中一些微生物受到了挑战。<br>在这些测试中,EZ-Fluo™方法与传统方法同时进行测试,并计算每个测试微生物的微生物回收率。<br>孵育时间稳健性表明,被测微生物被成功地检测到,并评估了微生物的回收率。<br>准确度试验表明,所测微生物均被成功检测,回收率与传统方法结果接近。<br>可以使用附录13:注释表,记录用EZ-FLUO™方法测试并成功检测的微生物列表。<br>如果成功检测到所有受试微生物,并满足稳健性、准确性、精密度和线性条件,则评估EZ-FLUO™方法的特异性。<br>备注:特异性也可从试验6.10:验证产品无干扰,不同微生物均在试验产品存在下进行试验。<br>ez-fluo™方法假阳性率<br>假阳性通常意味着一个测试声称一个样本是阳性的,而实际上不是,并在样本中没有阳性的地方进行评估。<br>评估假阳性发生率的方法是考虑在孵育时间稳健性和准确性测试期间处理的所有阴性对照(无微生物的样品)。<br>这种方法可以比较ez-fluo™方法和传统方法,因为两者都是并行测试的。<br>在处理过程中对阴性对照品进行处理,以验证操作条件是无菌的,并且该方法不会产生假阳性结果。<br>如果EZ-Fluo™方法阴性对照样品上有荧光斑点,则应进行调查。<br>建议调查方案如下:<br>ez-fluo阴性对照<br>荧光点<br>调查:<br>样品再孵育<br>=由于外来污染而产生的实际阳性结果<br>注:EZ-Fluo™样品应重新孵育,以达到相关药典推荐的孵育期。<br>传统方法的假阳性率应在传统方法验证过程中确定。<br>如果没有,则可以使用在当前EZ-Fluo™方法验证期间获得的结果,因为两种方法都是并行测试的。<br>如果使用针对孵育时间稳健性和准确性测试提出的抽样计划,则在每个微生物处理组中执行以下数量的无微生物阴性对照:<br>阴性对照品的数量(每个被测微生物)<br>EZ-Fluo™方法<br>孵育时间稳健性试验<br>阴性对照品总数<br>在培养时间稳健性和准确性测试中,以一种微生物类型为例,提出了抽样方案。<br>因此,检测的微生物越多,处理的阴性对照就越多。<br>这些阴性对照结果应加总,以确定假阳性结果的发生。<br>EZ-Fluo™法的假阳性率可计算如下:<br>误报点数量<br>将ez-fluo™方法的假阳性率与传统方法的假阳性率进行比较。<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: