疗程结束及随访时三组总有效率之间无差异（P＞0.05）；对于治显率，疗

The end of treatment and follow-up three groups there was no difference between the total efficiency (P> 0.05); significant for cure rate, after treatment, combined with acupuncture group Comparison group SET group statistically significant (P <0.01, P <0.05) , acupuncture combination group was no statistically significant (P> 0.05) as compared; and follow-up, the combination group compared to sET acupuncture group statistically significant (P <0.05), while non-acupuncture group compared sET group statistics significance (P> 0.05).

疗程结束及随访时三组总有效率之间无差异（P＞0.05）；对于治显率，疗程结束后，联合组与针刺组对比SET组有统计意义（P＜0.01，P＜0.05），联合组相比针刺组无统计意义（P＞0.05）；而随访时，联合组相比针刺组与SET组有统计意义（P＜0.05），而针刺组相比SET组无统计意义（P＞0.05）。

There was no difference in the total effective rate between the three groups at the end of the course of treatment and follow-up (P > 0.05); for the treatment rate, after the course of treatment, there was statistical significance in the combination group compared with the acupuncture group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05), and there was no statistical significance in the combination group compared with the acupuncture group (P > 0.05); while during the follow-up, there was statistical significance in the combination group compared with the acupuncture group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance in the acupuncture group compared with the set group Statistical significance (P > 0.05).<br>