由表4可知，两组患者治疗前MBI指数经t检验，无统计学意义(P＞0．0

As apparent from Table 4, the two groups of patients before therapeutic index MBI by t test, no statistically significant (P> 0.05), two groups of patients before treatment described ADL comparable equilibrium distribution function, index MBI two groups after treatment significantly improved compared to before treatment, there is statistically significant (P <0.01), and the treatment of patients to improve the degree of index MBI group than the control group, statistically significant (P <0.01).

As can be seen from Table 4, the pre-treatment MBI index of two groups of patients was t-tested and not statistically significant (P. 0. 05), show edges the balance of ADL function before treatment in two groups of patients is comparable, after treatment two groups of patients MBI index compared with pre-treatment significantly improved, statistically significant (P 0. 01), and the improvement of MBI index in the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group, which was statistically significant (P. 0. 01)。

It can be seen from table 4 that there is no statistical significance (P > 0.05) in the MBI index of the two groups before treatment through t-test, indicating that the ADL function distribution of the two groups before treatment is balanced and comparable, and the MBI index of the two groups after treatment is significantly higher than that before treatment, with statistical significance (P < 0.01), and the MBI index of the treatment group is significantly higher than that of the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.01) 。<br>