Defendant Belter argues that Plaint

Defendant Belter argues that Plaintiffs cannot allege a claim for breach of the May 2, 2017 agreement because the terms of that agreement were superseded by the August 10, 2018 amendment. (Doc. No. 3-1 at 8-10.) Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of the May 2, 2017 agreement is based on Defendant Belter’s alleged breach of the minimum sales requirements set forth in that agreement. (Doc. No. 1-13, FAC ¶ 36; see Doc. No. 14 Ex. G § 5.) Thus, Belter’s argument turns on whether the provisions in the August 10, 2018 amendment supersede the minimum sales requirements provision set forth in the May 2, 2017 agreement.