结果 治疗后夏枯草组总有效率为90.00%（54/60）优于西药组[7

Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the Prunella vulgaris group was 90.00% (54/60) better than the western medicine group [75.00% (45/60)] (P <0.05). Compared with the western medicine group, the neck pain, fever, fatigue symptoms relief rate, CD3 +, CD4 +, CD4 + / CD8 +, IL-10 levels of patients with cervical lymphatic tuberculosis in the Prunella vulgaris group were increased (P <0.05), conversion rate and TNF- The level of α decreased (P <0.05, P <0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions in the Prunella vulgaris group [28.33% (17/60)] compared with the Western medicine group [35.00% (21/60)], the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05).

Results The total efficiency of the summer herb group after treatment was 90.00% (54/60) which was better than that of the Western medicine group (75.00% (45/60) (P 0.05). Compared with western medicine group, neck pain, fever, fatigue symptom remission rate, CD3 plus, CD4 plus, CD4 plus/CD8 plus, IL-10 level increase (P 0.05), transoperative rate and TNF-alpha level decreased (P 0.05, P 0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions in the summer herb group was not statistically significant compared to the Western drug group (35.00% (21/60).

Results the total effective rate of Prunella vulgaris group was 90.00% (54 / 60), which was better than that of Western medicine group (75.00% (45 / 60)) (P < 0.05). Compared with the western medicine group, the relieving rate of neck pain, fever and asthenia, the level of CD3 +, CD4 +, CD4 + / CD8 +, IL-10 in the Prunella vulgaris group increased (P < 0.05), the conversion rate and TNF - α level decreased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between Prunella vulgaris Group [28.33% (17 / 60)] and Western Medicine Group [35.00% (21 / 60)] (P > 0.05).<br>