The analysis of distributive justic

The analysis of distributive justice starts behind the "'Veil of Ignorance'" and identifies the potentially worse off party affected by ethical dilemmas. Theft, which has violated the employee’s property rights, is the victim to the employee, and if the employee’s wages stolen can be solved, the employee will not have the “speed reading” student assessment, and the student will be renewed. Received the treatment of fair markers, employees will not have other problems associated with the stolen wages. Therefore, Staffs is the worst party. The employee's property rights are ignored and the result of moral dilemma selection:

The analysis of of the development of the justice starts after the "'Veil of Ignorance'" and the identifiers of the potentially worse off party by ethical dilemmas, when making a decision, in terms of property rights first, staff It's because the board wants to make more money that it's stolen, it's a violation of the employee's property rights, it's a victim for the employee, and if it can solve the problem of employees being stolen wages, the employee won't "quickly read" the student's story, the student will be treated fairly again, and the employee won't be treated fairly again, and the employee won't have any other problems because of the stolen wages, so Staffs is the worst party, and the employee's property rights are ignored. Results of ethical dilemma selection:

对分配正义的分析是从“无知的面纱”的背后开始的，它指出了受道德困境影响的可能更糟的一方，做出决定时，以財產權優先來說，工作人员是因為董事會想獲得更多利潤所以才被偷竊，這已經侵犯了員工的財產權, 對員工來說是受害的一方,，而且如果能解決員工被偷竊工資的問題，, 員工就不會發生”速讀”學生评估的事情,學生就會重新受回公平标记的對待, 員工也不會產生因為被偷竊工資連帶的其他問題，所以，员工是最糟糕的一方，員工的財產權被忽略，道德困境选择的结果：<br>