2 Of course, we in front of this new company, there is no guarantee that they have any plans, whether they will be low price for low quality, this situation we have to be one of the possible reasons for giving them a low price<br>Is the assessment price, which worries us, the only criterion?<br>The answer is obviously no, and it is worth noting here that prices are not the only criterion. As a standard case we want to control other variables unchanged, such as: the company's reputation, the size of the company, experience, etc. , the lower the price is the best choice for us. A single price-based standard can bring a lot of big hidden dangers.<br>What do we need to do in advance?<br>At this stage, we need to plan for the worst-case scenario,<br>1 What needs to be done before the contract is signed, pre-qualification of the company, evaluation of the bidders, we need to be responsible for the customer, and effectively understand the ability of the bidding company. Prevent unnecessary trouble before the contract is signed.<br>2 When the contract is signed, clarify the supervision rules of the project, as well as the penalty standard, the penalty matters, avoid the leakage of big problems, prevent the other company to benefit from the contract loophole<br>3 After signing the contract, do a good job of supervision, punishment. Preventing poor engineering quality, even if contractually agreed, time costs are critical to us.<br>Summarize<br>The 'TN Company's Big Probability' is a big challenge for us, attractive price is the option we expect and have concerns about, must make the right choice throughout the bidding process, we give risk-averse and cost reduction options are: choose two-stage selective bidding, Comprehensive assessment of tN company and other companies' qualifications, can not be a single price as a standard, do a good job of prequalification and evaluation of bidders, determine the penalty system, do a good job in the implementation of the project supervision work. Maximize the benefits.
正在翻译中..