【词条的审核制度】据了解,维基百科是不需要审核直接通过的,内容属于实时更新,所展示的信息能否长久保存,取决于来源佐证资料的权威性和可查证度,的英语翻译

【词条的审核制度】据了解,维基百科是不需要审核直接通过的,内容属于实时

【词条的审核制度】据了解,维基百科是不需要审核直接通过的,内容属于实时更新,所展示的信息能否长久保存,取决于来源佐证资料的权威性和可查证度,所以维基百科的信息不审核的结果,可能就是你每个时间去看是不一样的,大量关注这条信息的频繁地更改它。虽然百度百科的大部分信息也是可以改的,但是改起来也是需要佐证的,没有权威佐证极难通过,所以相对来说,信息的稳定程度更高。而在审核的速度上,百度百科由系统与人工共同组成,人为地会存在一些认知、专业程度的问题,但有人审总比没有人审核好,一条词条展示的信息持续可操控也不见得是好事,更新太过于频繁,已存在脑中的认知会像走马灯一样被刷新,结果就是,你该不该“怀疑人生”。事实上,不管是百度百科还是维基百科,去维护那么庞大的一个数据库,其工作量可见是十分之艰巨的,难免都有不足的地方,因而网民们多一分了解,能方便网民的词条就是好词条。
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (英语) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
[Verification system of entries] <br><br>It is understood that Wikipedia does not need to be reviewed and passed directly. The content is updated in real time. Whether the displayed information can be stored for a long time depends on the authority and verifiability of the source supporting information. Therefore, Wikipedia The result of not reviewing the information may be that you look at it differently every time, and you pay a lot of attention to this information and frequently change it. <br>Although most of the information on Baidu Baike can be changed, it also needs to be confirmed. It is extremely difficult to pass without authoritative support, so relatively speaking, the information is more stable. <br>In terms of the speed of review, Baidu Baike is composed of systems and humans, artificially there will be some cognitive and professional problems, but it is better for someone to review than no one, and the information displayed by an entry is continuously controllable and not seen. It has to be a good thing. If you update too frequently, the existing cognition in your brain will be refreshed like a revolving lantern. The result is, should you "doubt life". <br>In fact, whether it is Baidu Baike or Wikipedia, to maintain such a huge database, the workload can be seen to be very arduous, and it is inevitable that there are deficiencies. Therefore, netizens have a better understanding and can facilitate the entry of netizens. It's a good entry.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
The review system of terms<br><br>It is understood that Wikipedia is not required to audit directly through, the content belongs to real-time updates, the information displayed can be long-term preservation, depending on the authority of the source supporting information and verifiable degree, so Wikipedia information does not audit the results, may be you every time to see is not the same, a lot of attention to this information frequently change it.<br>Although most of Baidu Encyclopedia's information can also be changed, but it also needs to be corroborated, there is no authoritative corroboration is extremely difficult to pass, so relatively speaking, the degree of stability of information is higher.<br>And in the speed of audit, Baidu Encyclopedia by the system and labor together, artificially there will be some cognitive, professional level of problems, but some people review better than no one to review, a term shows the information continued to be manipulatible is not necessarily a good thing, update too often, already exist in the brain will be refreshed like a horse lamp, the result is that you should not "suspect life."<br>In fact, whether it is Baidu Encyclopedia or Wikipedia, to maintain such a huge database, its workload can be seen to be very difficult, inevitably there are shortcomings, so netizens a little more understanding, can facilitate the netizen's entry is a good term.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
[examination system of entry]<br>It is understood that Wikipedia does not need to be approved directly. Its content is updated in real time. Whether the information displayed can be preserved for a long time depends on the authority and verifiability of the source supporting materials. Therefore, the result of not approving Wikipedia's information may be that you look at it differently every time. You pay a lot of attention to this information and change it frequently.<br>Although most of Baidu Encyclopedia's information can also be changed, it also needs evidence to change. It is extremely difficult to pass without authoritative evidence, so relatively speaking, the degree of information stability is higher.<br>In terms of the speed of auditing, Baidu Encyclopedia is composed of system and human. There will be some cognitive and professional problems artificially. However, it is better for someone to audit than no one to audit. It is not necessarily a good thing that the information displayed by an entry can be continuously manipulated. If it is updated too frequently, the existing cognition in the brain will be refreshed like a horse lantern. As a result, should you "cherish" I doubt life.<br>In fact, whether it is Baidu Encyclopedia or Wikipedia, to maintain such a huge database, the workload can be seen to be very arduous, and there are inevitably deficiencies. Therefore, netizens have a little more understanding, and the entry that can facilitate netizens is a good entry.<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: