The review system of terms<br><br>It is understood that Wikipedia is not required to audit directly through, the content belongs to real-time updates, the information displayed can be long-term preservation, depending on the authority of the source supporting information and verifiable degree, so Wikipedia information does not audit the results, may be you every time to see is not the same, a lot of attention to this information frequently change it.<br>Although most of Baidu Encyclopedia's information can also be changed, but it also needs to be corroborated, there is no authoritative corroboration is extremely difficult to pass, so relatively speaking, the degree of stability of information is higher.<br>And in the speed of audit, Baidu Encyclopedia by the system and labor together, artificially there will be some cognitive, professional level of problems, but some people review better than no one to review, a term shows the information continued to be manipulatible is not necessarily a good thing, update too often, already exist in the brain will be refreshed like a horse lamp, the result is that you should not "suspect life."<br>In fact, whether it is Baidu Encyclopedia or Wikipedia, to maintain such a huge database, its workload can be seen to be very difficult, inevitably there are shortcomings, so netizens a little more understanding, can facilitate the netizen's entry is a good term.
正在翻译中..