I waited until my Ph. D. committee had left the room to break down. I 的简体中文翻译

I waited until my Ph. D. committee

I waited until my Ph. D. committee had left the room to break down. I had just failed my dissertation proposal defense(学位论文容辩)— a poor start to my fourth year of grad school(研究生院). My committee members had told me that my experiments were too small-scale, my ideas not deep enough. I realize now that they were pushing me because they believed in me. But at that moment, all I could hear was the voice in my head telling me that I’d failed. For the next 4 months, I lacked focus at work. I no longer double-checked my experiments, and I had trouble finding the energy to even think about re-writing my proposal. Actually, the outcome of my proposal defense wasn’t the only cause of my slump. After some thought, it dawned on me that I had been putting undue pressure on myself throughout grad school. To believe I was making good progress, I needed external validation — an award, positive results, or praise from professors I respected. When I didn’t get those things at every opportunity, I felt I was not on the right track. When I didn’t pass the defense, the failure confirmed my self-doubts. Eventually, as my loss of confidence became a bigger problem, I knew that I had to do something about it. I decided that I needed to set healthier standards for myself. I did not have control over how much praise I received. The only thing I had control over, I realized, was the effort I put forth. I went into my second proposal defense with a much more positive mindset(思维模式)along with grander experiments in my proposal and passed. I’m pleased to report that my new approach has helped me regain confidence in myself — and my work — and I’m more productive as a result. I hope that I can help other students realize that external validation is not always guaranteed, and if they are doing their best, that is good enough. 24. What directly leads to the failure of the author’s first defense? A. Imperfection of his proposal. B. His negative mindset. C. The committee’s lack of confidence. D. The choice of his experiments. 25. What can we learn about the author from paragraph 3? A. He was under a lot of pressure from his parents. B. He made progress with the help of his professor. C. He used to overemphasize the recognition he got. D. Getting positive results helped him get over shyness. 26. Which word can best describe the author? A. Adaptable. B. Ambitious. C. Generous. D. Outgoing. 27. What does the text mainly tell us? A. We should spend more time reflecting. B. We should be thankful for our failures. C. We should focus more on our own effort. D. We should keep calm in the face of failure.
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (简体中文) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
我一直等到博士学位委员会离开房间崩溃为止。我刚好没通过学位论文答辩(学位论文容辩),那是我研究生院四年级的开端。我的委员会成员告诉我,我的实验规模太小,我的想法还不够深入。现在我意识到他们之所以推我是因为他们相信我。但是那一刻,我所能听到的只是脑海里的声音告诉我我失败了。<br>在接下来的四个月中,我缺乏工作重点。我不再仔细检查实验,甚至找不到重新编写建议的能量。<br>实际上,我的提案答辩结果并不是造成我表现不佳的唯一原因。经过一番思考,我突然意识到我在整个研究生院一直对自己施加过大的压力。要相信自己取得了良好的进步,我需要进行外部验证-奖励,积极的成果,或受到我尊敬的教授的称赞。当我没有抓住一切机会时,我就觉得自己走错了方向。当我没有通过辩护时,失败证明了我的自我怀疑。最终,当我失去信心成为一个更大的问题时,我知道我必须为此做些事情。<br>我决定需要为自己设定更健康的标准。我无法控制自己获得的好评。我意识到,我唯一能控制的就是我付出的努力。<br>我以更积极的心态(思维模式)进入第二次求婚提议,并在提议中进行了更宏大的实验并获得通过。我很高兴地报告说,我的新方法帮助我重新获得了对自己以及工作的信心,因此我的工作效率更高。我希望我可以帮助其他学生认识到,始终不能保证外部验证,如果他们尽力而为,那就足够了。<br>24.是什么直接导致提交人的第一辩护失败?<br>A.他的建议不完善。<br>B.他的消极心态。<br>C.委员会缺乏信心。<br>D.选择他的实验。<br>25.从第3款中我们可以了解作者什么?<br>答:他受到父母的很大压力。<br>B.他在教授的帮助下取得了进步。<br>C.他过去过分强调自己得到的认可。<br>D.获得积极的结果帮助他克服了羞怯。<br>26.哪个词最能描述作者?<br>A.适应性强。B.雄心勃勃。<br>C.慷慨。D.外向。<br>27.文字主要告诉我们什么?<br>答:我们应该花更多的时间进行反思。<br>B.我们应该为我们的失败表示感谢。<br>C.我们应该更加专注于自己的努力。<br>D.面对失败,我们应该保持冷静。
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
I waited until my Ph. D. committee had left the room to break down. I had just failed my dissertation proposal defense(学位论文容辩)— a poor start to my fourth year of grad school(研究生院). My committee members had told me that my experiments were too small-scale, my ideas not deep enough. I realize now that they were pushing me because they believed in me. But at that moment, all I could hear was the voice in my head telling me that I’d failed. <br>For the next 4 months, I lacked focus at work. I no longer double-checked my experiments, and I had trouble finding the energy to even think about re-writing my proposal. <br>Actually, the outcome of my proposal defense wasn’t the only cause of my slump. After some thought, it dawned on me that I had been putting undue pressure on myself throughout grad school. To believe I was making good progress, I needed external validation — an award, positive results, or praise from professors I respected. When I didn’t get those things at every opportunity, I felt I was not on the right track. When I didn’t pass the defense, the failure confirmed my self-doubts. Eventually, as my loss of confidence became a bigger problem, I knew that I had to do something about it. <br>I decided that I needed to set healthier standards for myself. I did not have control over how much praise I received. The only thing I had control over, I realized, was the effort I put forth. <br>I went into my second proposal defense with a much more positive mindset(思维模式)along with grander experiments in my proposal and passed. I’m pleased to report that my new approach has helped me regain confidence in myself — and my work — and I’m more productive as a result. I hope that I can help other students realize that external validation is not always guaranteed, and if they are doing their best, that is good enough. <br>24. What directly leads to the failure of the author’s first defense? <br>A. Imperfection of his proposal. <br>B. His negative mindset. <br>C. The committee’s lack of confidence. <br>D. The choice of his experiments. <br>25. What can we learn about the author from paragraph 3? <br>A. He was under a lot of pressure from his parents. <br>B. He made progress with the help of his professor. <br>C. He used to overemphasize the recognition he got. <br>D. Getting positive results helped him get over shyness. <br>26. Which word can best describe the author? <br>A. Adaptable. B. Ambitious. <br>C. Generous. D. Outgoing. <br>27. What does the text mainly tell us? <br>A. We should spend more time reflecting. <br>B. We should be thankful for our failures. <br>C. We should focus more on our own effort. <br>D. We should keep calm in the face of failure.
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
我一直等到我的博士委员会离开会议室解散。我刚刚没能通过论文答辩,这是我研究生四年级的一个糟糕开局。我的委员会成员告诉我,我的实验规模太小,我的想法不够深刻。我现在意识到他们推我是因为他们相信我。但在那一刻,我只能听到脑海中的声音告诉我我失败了。<br>在接下来的4个月里,我在工作中缺乏注意力。我不再重复检查我的实验,我也很难找到精力来考虑重新写我的建议。<br>事实上,我的提案答辩结果并不是我情绪低落的唯一原因。经过一番思考,我突然意识到,我在整个研究生院都在给自己施加不适当的压力。为了相信自己取得了良好的进步,我需要外部的认可——奖励、积极的结果,或者来自我尊敬的教授的赞扬。当我没有抓住每一个机会得到这些东西的时候,我觉得我没有走上正确的轨道。当我没有通过答辩时,失败证实了我的自我怀疑。最后,当我失去信心成为一个更大的问题时,我知道我必须做些什么。<br>我决定我需要为自己制定更健康的标准。我无法控制我得到了多少赞扬。我意识到,我唯一能控制的就是我所付出的努力。<br>我以一种更加积极的心态进行第二次提案答辩,并在提案中进行了更为宏大的实验,结果通过了。我很高兴地告诉大家,我的新方法帮助我重拾了对自己和工作的信心,因此我的工作效率更高。我希望我能帮助其他学生认识到,外部验证并不总是有保证的,如果他们尽力了,那就足够了。<br>24岁。是什么直接导致了作者第一次辩护的失败?<br>A、 他的建议不完善。<br>B、 他的消极心态。<br>C、 委员会缺乏信心。<br>D、 他的实验选择。<br>25岁。从第三段我们可以了解到作者的什么?<br>A、 他受到父母的很大压力。<br>B、 他在教授的帮助下取得了进步。<br>C、 他过去过分强调得到的认可。<br>D、 得到积极的结果帮助他克服了害羞。<br>26岁。哪个词最能形容作者?<br>A、 适应性强。B、 雄心勃勃。<br>C、 慷慨大方。D、 外向的。<br>27岁。课文主要告诉我们什么?<br>A、 我们应该花更多的时间思考。<br>B、 我们应该感谢我们的失败。<br>C、 我们应该更加注重自己的努力。<br>D、 面对失败,我们应该保持冷静。<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: