疗程结束及随访时三组总有效率之间无差异（P＞0.05）；而对于疗程结束

The end of treatment and follow-up, there is no difference between the total efficiency (P> 0.05) three groups; for significant cure rate after the end of treatment, and the combination group Comparison group acupuncture group SET statistically significant (P <0.01, P <0.05 ), the combination group compared to non-acupuncture group statistically significant (P> 0.05) ,; significant cure rate of the follow-up, the combination group compared to sET acupuncture group statistically significant (P <0.05), and acupuncture group compared sET group was not statistically significant (P> 0.05).

There was no difference between the total efficiency of the three groups at the end of the course of treatment and follow-up (P.0.05), and for the treatment rate after the end of the treatment, the combined group compared the SET group with the needle group had statistical significance (P 0.01, P 0.05), compared to the needle in the combined group. The group had no statistical significance (P.0.05), while the follow-up rate of the dominant group, compared to the needle group compared to the SET group has statistical significance (P 0.05), and the needle group compared to the SET group has no statistical significance (P.05).

There was no difference in the total effective rate between the three groups at the end of the course of treatment and follow-up (P > 0.05); but for the treatment rate after the end of the course of treatment, the combination group had statistical significance compared with the acupuncture group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05), the combination group had no statistical significance compared with the acupuncture group (P > 0.05); while the treatment rate at the time of follow-up, the combination group had statistical significance compared with the acupuncture group (P < 0.05), while the acupuncture group had statistical significance compared with the set group (P < 0.05) There was no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05).