从历史上看，归化和异化可以视为直译和意译的概念延伸，但又不完全等同于直

从历史上看，归化和异化可以视为直译和意译的概念延伸，但又不完全等同于直译和意译。直译和意译所关注的核心问题是如何在语言层面处理形式和意义，而异化和归化则突破了语言因素的局限，将视野扩展到语言、文化和美学等因素。按韦努蒂(Venuti)的说法，归化法是"把原作者带入译入语文化"，而异化法则是"接受外语文本的语言及文化差异，把读者带入外国情景"。(Venuti，1995:20)由此可见，直译和意译主要是局限于语言层面的价值取向，异化和归化则是立足于文化大语境下的价值取向，两者之间的差异是显而易见的，不能混为一谈。

从历史上看，归化和异化可以视为直译和意译的概念延伸，但又不完全等同于直译和意译。 直译和意译所关注的核心问题是如何在语言层面处理形式和意义，而异化和归化则突破了语言因素的局限，将视野扩展到语言、文化和美学等因素。 按韦努蒂(Venuti)的说法，归化法是"把原作者带入译入语文化"，而异化法则是"接受外语文本的语言及文化差异，把读者带入外国情景"。 (Venuti，1995:20)由此可见，直译和意译主要是局限于语言层面的价值取向，异化和归化则是立足于文化大语境下的价值取向，两者之间的差异是显而易见的，不能混为一谈。

Historically, domestication and foreignization can be regarded as the extension of literal translation and free translation, but they are not exactly equivalent to literal translation and free translation. The core issue of literal translation and free translation is how to deal with form and meaning at the linguistic level, while foreignization and domestication break through the limitations of linguistic factors and expand the field of vision to linguistic, cultural and aesthetic factors. According to Venuti, the domestication method is to "bring the original author into the culture of the target language", while the alienation method is to "accept the language and cultural differences of the foreign language text and bring the reader into the foreign situation". (Venuti, 1995:20) it can be seen that literal translation and free translation are mainly limited to the value orientation at the language level, while foreignization and domestication are based on the value orientation in the context of culture. The differences between them are obvious and cannot be confused.<br>