利用表4的结果对8种法算进行分析比较：在函数F7中，CCGOA和CGO

利用表4的结果对8种法算进行分析比较：在函数F7中，CCGOA和CGOA获得了相似的平均值、标准差和SR。对8种算法在14个标准测试函数中SR值为100%的个数进行统计，结果显示CCGOA为13次，CGOA为8次，CPSO为4次，OBLGOA、MFO、SCA和CCS均为2次，且CCGOA的SR的均值为92.8%,CGOA的均值为57.17%，CPSO为28.57%，GOA及其他算法的SR值为14.27%，说明CCGOA的寻优结果在8种算法中为效果最佳。从表中可以进一步看出，CCGOA的优化均值和标准差显著优于其他算法，除了函数F7和F9，剩下的11个函数计算结果，效果远好于其他7种算法。

0/5000

源语言: -

目标语言: -

结果 (英语) 1: [复制]

复制成功！

The results in Table 4 using the eight kinds of analysis and comparison calculation method: In the function F7, CCGOA CGOA and yielded similar mean, standard deviation, SR. 8 algorithms SR value of 100% in the number of statistical functions 14 standard test showed CCGOA 13 times, CGOA is 8, the CPSO was 4 times, OBLGOA, MFO, SCA and CCS are 2 , SR and CCGOA mean of 92.8%, average CGOA was 57.17%, CPSO was 28.57% and 14.27% GOA SR value other algorithms described optimization for best results in CCGOA eight kinds of algorithms. Can further be seen from the table, CCGOA optimization mean and standard deviation was significantly better than others, and in addition to the F9 function F7, the remaining 11 function calculation results, much better than seven other algorithms.

正在翻译中..

结果 (英语) 2:[复制]

复制成功！

The results of Table 4 were analyzed and compared with 8 methods: in function F7, CCGOA and CGOA obtained similar averages, standard deviations and SRs. The results show that the number of SR values of 100% in 14 standard test functions of 8 algorithms is calculated, and the results show that CCGOA is 13 times, CGOA is 8 times, CPSO is 4 times, OBLGOA, MFO, SCA and CCS are all 2 times, and the average sedatofy sr of CCGOA is 92.8%. The mean of CGOA is 57.17%, CPSO is 28.57%, and the SR value of GOA and other algorithms is 14.27%, which shows that CCGOA's results are the best of the 8 algorithms. It can be further seen from the table that the optimization mean and standard deviation of CCGOA are significantly better than other algorithms, except for the functions F7 and F9, the remaining 11 functions are calculated, the effect is much better than the other 7 algorithms.

正在翻译中..

结果 (英语) 3:[复制]

复制成功！

The results of Table 4 are used to analyze and compare the eight methods: in function F7, ccgoa and CGOA obtain similar mean value, standard deviation and Sr. The results show that ccgoa is 13 times, CGOA is 8 times, CPSO is 4 times, oblgoa, MFO, SCA and CCS are all 2 times, and the mean of SR of ccgoa is 92.8%, CGOA is 57.17%, CPSO is 28.57%, and SR of Goa and other algorithms is 14.27%, which shows that the optimization results of ccgoa are the best among the 8 algorithms. It can be further seen from the table that the optimized mean value and standard deviation of ccgoa are significantly better than other algorithms. In addition to functions F7 and F9, the results of the remaining 11 functions are far better than the other seven algorithms.<br>

正在翻译中..

其它语言

本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.