Genette's classificatory scheme is

Genette的分类方案是对长期讨论的问题的更精细和系统的处理。它尚未受到严重挑战。相反，当我们转向观点时，Genette的“聚焦化”一词引起了很多争论。聚焦是针对早期模型的弱点而制定的，该模型将观点和声音的类别混淆了，方法是通过称呼叙述者为叙述者的角色为角色，或者通过在观点的观点下呈现一个包含状态的模型叙述者的。实际上，Genette明确地将他的新任期与以前的模型相结合。他所坚持的只是“谁看见了？” 与“谁说话？”是一个单独的问题。他认为这个新词有用，因为他奇怪地认为它的视觉含义较少。

吉内特的分类方案是更精细、更系统地处理长期讨论的问题;它没有受到严重挑战。相比之下，当我们转向观点时，吉内特的"焦点"一词引发了大量辩论。焦点的制定是为了应对先前模型的弱点，这些弱点混淆了观点和声音的类别，要么将叙述的字符叫为叙述者，要么在观点下呈现一种接受叙述者地位的模型。事实上，吉内特明确地将他的新术语与早期的模型对齐;他坚持的只是 "谁看见？这个新术语，他认为有用什么，他奇怪地认为其不那么视觉的内涵。

Genette's classificatory scheme is a more refined and systematic treatment of issues long discussed; it has not been seriously challenged. When we turn to point of view, by contrast, Genette's term 'focalization' has provoked a great deal of debate. Focalization was formulated in response to the weaknesses of earlier models which confused the categories of point of view and voice, either by calling the character from whose point of view the narrative was rendered a narrator or by presenting under point of view a model embracing the status of the narrator. Genette in fact explicitly aligned his new term with earlier models; all he insisted was that 'who sees?' was a separate question from 'who speaks?'. The new term he thought useful for what he oddly regarded as its less visual connotation.<br>