3. Results3.1. Course ObjectivesThe students’ answers to the questions related to defining objectives, respecting the stated objectives and achieving the objectives pursued are presented in Table 1.It appears from the analysis in Table 1 that the responses of 67.8% of students on the clear definition of the teaching objectives converged more towards“agree” (p < 0.01). However, in order to meet the stated objectives, 65.5% of the students (p < 0.05) were more inclined towards “strongly disagree”. Likewise,when reaching the objectives pursued, 68.9% of the students more often mentioned “strongly disagree” (p < 0.001).3.2. Course ContentThe scores relating to the responses obtained in relation to the content of the courses are shown in Table 2.In total, 42.2% of students underlined the adaptability of the content of the lessons to the prior knowledge and to the level of knowledge on the content of the, the difference being not significant (p > 0.05). Likewise, for consistency and complementarity with the other lessons on content, the difference in responses was not significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, education appeared complete and rigorous for 81.1% of the students with a significant difference (p < 0.001) in favor of “totally agree”.3.3. Teaching Strategies and Course MaterialsStudent responses are listed in Table 3.The values recorded in Table 3 indicate that 44.4% of the students (p > 0.05) answered “totally agree” regarding the importance of the lessons learned for the professional project. However, for the amount of work requested by teachers,72.2% of students (p < 0.01) answered “okay”. But for the adaptation of the pedagogical approach to the level of knowledge and training, 54.4% of the students were in favor of “completely agree” (p > 0.05). Similarly for the availability of teachers, 58.9% of student responses (p < 0.05) converged towards “totally agree”. In addition, for 43.3% of students, opinions relating to the mode of transmission of knowledge leaned towards “totally agree” (p> 0.05). Finally, for the quality of the materials, the student response rates agree “totally agree”44.4% (p > 0.05)
3. Results<br>3.1. Course Objectives<br>The students’ answers to the questions related to defining objectives, respecting the stated objectives and achieving the objectives pursued are presented in Table 1.It appears from the analysis in Table 1 that the responses of 67.8% of students on the clear definition of the teaching objectives converged more towards“agree” (p < 0.01). However, in order to meet the stated objectives, 65.5% of the students (p < 0.05) were more inclined towards “strongly disagree”. Likewise,when reaching the objectives pursued, 68.9% of the students more often mentioned “strongly disagree” (p < 0.001).<br>3.2. Course Content<br>The scores relating to the responses obtained in relation to the content of the courses are shown in Table 2.In total, 42.2% of students underlined the adaptability of the content of the lessons to the prior knowledge and to the level of knowledge on the content of the, the difference being not significant (p > 0.05). Likewise, for consistency and complementarity with the other lessons on content, the difference in responses was not significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, education appeared complete and rigorous for 81.1% of the students with a significant difference (p < 0.001) in favor of “totally agree”.<br>3.3. Teaching Strategies and Course Materials<br>Student responses are listed in Table 3.The values recorded in Table 3 indicate that 44.4% of the students (p > 0.05) answered “totally agree” regarding the importance of the lessons learned for the professional project. However, for the amount of work requested by teachers,72.2% of students (p < 0.01) answered “okay”. But for the adaptation of the pedagogical approach to the level of knowledge and training, 54.4% of the students were in favor of “completely agree” (p > 0.05). Similarly for the availability of teachers, 58.9% of student responses (p < 0.05) converged towards “totally agree”. In addition, for 43.3% of students, opinions relating to the mode of transmission of knowledge leaned towards “totally agree” (p> 0.05). Finally, for the quality of the materials, the student response rates agree “totally agree”44.4% (p > 0.05)
正在翻译中..