Using TiO2 G5, which has a very high surface area (˜370 m2/g), an increase in densification was obtained. Mixing G5 powder with a 60 wt% of H2O, the amount needed to cover the entire surface of the powder according to theoretical calculations, sample CS_G1 (Fig. 4b) was obtained with a translucent, well-consolidated surface and with sharp and regular edges. CS_G1 didn’t crumble even after cutting and the relative density was equal to 68%. Similar results were obtained using an excess of deionized H2O (CS_G2). Since a natural pH of 7.0 was shown by the G5 suspension (par. 3.1), i.e. close to the isoelectric point of TiO2 [36], a further test was performed in the same CSP condition of CS_G1 and CS_G2 (Table 1) using 60 wt% of 1 M acetic acid solution (pH = 3.0) instead of deionized water, i.e. lowering the pH close to that of P25 and DT51. As a relative density equal to 68% was again obtained, powder coagulationwas excluded to affect the sintering behaviour in deionized water. According to these results, the specific surface area of the starting powder appears to be the key parameter for sintering TiO2 by CSP. The high surface area of the nanoparticles and, consequently, the greater surfaceenergy (greater particle curvature angle) which tends to decrease during sintering, provides a strong driving force that promotes the densification.
Using TiO2 G5, which has a very high surface area (˜370 m2/g), an increase in densification was obtained. Mixing G5 powder with a 60 wt% of H2O, the amount needed to cover the entire surface of the powder according to theoretical calculations, sample CS_G1 (Fig. 4b) was obtained with a translucent, well-consolidated surface and with sharp and regular edges. CS_G1 didn’t crumble even after cutting and the relative density was equal to 68%. Similar results were obtained using an excess of deionized H2O (CS_G2). Since a natural pH of 7.0 was shown by the G5 suspension (par. 3.1), i.e. close to the isoelectric point of TiO2 [36], a further test was performed in the same CSP condition of CS_G1 and CS_G2 (Table 1) using 60 wt% of 1 M acetic acid solution (pH = 3.0) instead of deionized water, i.e. lowering the pH close to that of P25 and DT51. As a relative density equal to 68% was again obtained, powder coagulation<br>was excluded to affect the sintering behaviour in deionized water. According to these results, the specific surface area of the starting powder appears to be the key parameter for sintering TiO2 by CSP. The high surface area of the nanoparticles and, consequently, the greater surface<br>energy (greater particle curvature angle) which tends to decrease during sintering, provides a strong driving force that promotes the densification.
正在翻译中..