Treatment of these symptoms can play an important role in achiev-ing o的简体中文翻译

Treatment of these symptoms can pla

Treatment of these symptoms can play an important role in achiev-ing optimal outcomes, including improved remission and functioning (Fava et al., 2004; Ohayon, 2004; Robinson et al., 2013). Duloxetine has been shown to be effective in treating such painful symptoms associ-ated with depression (Fava et al., 2004; Brecht et al., 2007; Robinson et al., 2013), whereas no such evi-dence is available for SSRIs. For instance, Fava et al. (2004) examined the effect of duloxetine on depression-related PPS in a post-hoc analysis of two identically designed 9-week RCTs of duloxetine with a daily dose of 60 mg versus placebo. The study reported the superiority of duloxetine over placebo in reducing pain severity. In addition, improvements in pain severity were found to be associated with more favor-able depression treatment outcomes, including higher rates of remission and improved QoL. More recently, similar findings were also reported in a post-hoc analysis of two identically designed 8-week trials com-paring the efficacy of 60 mg/day duloxetine with that of placebo (Robinson et al., 2013). Using path analysis, the study showed that 16% of the likelihood of remis-sion in depression symptoms was attributable to the direct effect of treatment, 41% attributable to pain reduction, and the rest attributable to functional improvement. Furthermore, this trial also showed that duloxetine-treated patients with at least 30% or 50% improvement in pain severity at endpoint achieved more remission, compared with duloxetine-treated patients without these levels of improvement in pain (Gaynor et al., 2011a,b). In light of these findings, it should also be noted that although 45% of the patients included in our study had PPS at baseline, this percentage decreased to 15% at 8 weeks and 5% at 24 weeks. The improvement in these painful symptoms might have further contributed to the superiority of duloxetine over SSRIs on depression outcomes and QoL in our study. This is also supported by our obser-vation that the effects of duloxetine relative to SSRIs were greater in patients who had PPS at baseline than in those patients without such symptoms at baseline. Taken together, our findings reconfirm the importance of controlling pain symptoms in the treatment of depression and the potential advantages of duloxetine over SSRIs at least for patients with concurrent pain and depression.
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (简体中文) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
这些症状的治疗可在实现最佳结局中发挥重要作用,包括改善缓解和功能(Fava等,2004; Ohayon,2004; Robinson等,2013)。已证明度洛西汀可有效治疗与抑郁症相关的痛苦症状(Fava等,2004; Brecht等,2007; Robinson等,2013),而SSRI尚无此类证据。 。例如,Fava等。(2004)在对每日剂量为60 mg的度洛西汀与安慰剂的两个相同设计的9周RCT进行事后分析后,研究了度洛西汀对抑郁相关PPS的影响。该研究报道了度洛西汀在减轻疼痛严重程度方面优于安慰剂。此外,发现疼痛严重程度的改善与更有利的抑郁症治疗结果相关,包括更高的缓解率和改善的生活质量。最近,在两项相同设计的8周试验的事后分析中也报告了类似的发现,比较了60 mg /天度洛西汀和安慰剂的疗效(Robinson等人,2013)。使用路径分析,研究表明,抑郁症状缓解的可能性的16%归因于治疗的直接作用,41%归因于疼痛减轻,其余归因于功能改善。此外,该试验还显示,与度洛西汀治疗组相比,疼痛度改善至少30%或50%的患者,度洛西汀治疗组患者的缓解率更高(Gaynor等,2011a, b)。根据这些发现,还应注意,尽管我们研究中包括的患者中有45%在基线时具有PPS,但该百分比在第8周降至15%,在第24周降至5%。在我们的研究中,这些疼痛症状的改善可能进一步有助于度洛西汀在抑郁症结局和QoL方面优于SSRIs。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即在基线时具有PPS的患者中度洛西汀相对于SSRI的影响要大于在基线时没有这种症状的患者。两者合计,我们的发现再次确认了控制抑郁症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRI的潜在优势,至少对于同时伴有疼痛和抑郁症的患者而言。该百分比在第8周降至15%,在第24周降至5%。在我们的研究中,这些疼痛症状的改善可能进一步有助于度洛西汀在抑郁症结局和QoL方面优于SSRIs。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即在基线时具有PPS的患者中度洛西汀相对于SSRI的影响要大于在基线时没有这种症状的患者。两者合计,我们的发现再次确认了控制抑郁症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRI的潜在优势,至少对于同时伴有疼痛和抑郁症的患者而言。该百分比在第8周降至15%,在第24周降至5%。在我们的研究中,这些疼痛症状的改善可能进一步有助于度洛西汀在抑郁症结局和QoL方面优于SSRIs。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即在基线时具有PPS的患者中度洛西汀相对于SSRI的影响要大于在基线时没有这种症状的患者。两者合计,我们的发现再次确认了控制抑郁症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRI的潜在优势,至少对于同时伴有疼痛和抑郁症的患者而言。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即在基线时具有PPS的患者中度洛西汀相对于SSRI的影响要大于在基线时没有这种症状的患者。两者合计,我们的发现再次确认了控制抑郁症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRI的潜在优势,至少对于同时伴有疼痛和抑郁症的患者而言。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即在基线时具有PPS的患者中度洛西汀相对于SSRI的影响要大于在基线时没有这种症状的患者。两者合计,我们的发现再次确认了控制抑郁症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRI的潜在优势,至少对于同时伴有疼痛和抑郁症的患者而言。
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
Treatment of these symptoms can play an important role in achiev-ing optimal outcomes, including improved remission and functioning (Fava et al., 2004; Ohayon, 2004; Robinson et al., 2013). Duloxetine has been shown to be effective in treating such painful symptoms associ-ated with depression (Fava et al., 2004; Brecht et al., 2007; Robinson et al., 2013), whereas no such evi-dence is available for SSRIs. For instance, Fava et al. (2004) examined the effect of duloxetine on depression-related PPS in a post-hoc analysis of two identically designed 9-week RCTs of duloxetine with a daily dose of 60 mg versus placebo. The study reported the superiority of duloxetine over placebo in reducing pain severity. In addition, improvements in pain severity were found to be associated with more favor-able depression treatment outcomes, including higher rates of remission and improved QoL. More recently, similar findings were also reported in a post-hoc analysis of two identically designed 8-week trials com-paring the efficacy of 60 mg/day duloxetine with that of placebo (Robinson et al., 2013). Using path analysis, the study showed that 16% of the likelihood of remis-sion in depression symptoms was attributable to the direct effect of treatment, 41% attributable to pain reduction, and the rest attributable to functional improvement. Furthermore, this trial also showed that duloxetine-treated patients with at least 30% or 50% improvement in pain severity at endpoint achieved more remission, compared with duloxetine-treated patients without these levels of improvement in pain (Gaynor et al., 2011a,b). In light of these findings, it should also be noted that although 45% of the patients included in our study had PPS at baseline, this percentage decreased to 15% at 8 weeks and 5% at 24 weeks. The improvement in these painful symptoms might have further contributed to the superiority of duloxetine over SSRIs on depression outcomes and QoL in our study. This is also supported by our obser-vation that the effects of duloxetine relative to SSRIs were greater in patients who had PPS at baseline than in those patients without such symptoms at baseline. Taken together, our findings reconfirm the importance of controlling pain symptoms in the treatment of depression and the potential advantages of duloxetine over SSRIs at least for patients with concurrent pain and depression.
正在翻译中..
结果 (简体中文) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
对这些症状的治疗可以在获得最佳结果方面发挥重要作用,包括改善缓解和功能(Fava等人,2004年;Ohayon,2004年;Robinson等人,2013年)。度洛西汀已被证明能有效地治疗与抑郁症相关的疼痛症状(Fava等人,2004;Brecht等人,2007;Robinson等人,2013),而对于SSRIs则没有这样的证据。例如,Fava等人。(2004)在两个相同设计的9周随机对照试验中,研究了度洛西汀对抑郁症相关PPS的影响,并与安慰剂进行了比较。研究报告了度洛西汀在减轻疼痛严重程度方面优于安慰剂。此外,疼痛严重程度的改善被发现与更有利的抑郁症治疗结果相关,包括更高的缓解率和改善的生活质量。最近,在两个设计相同的8周试验的事后分析中也报告了类似的发现,这两个试验比较了60毫克/天度洛西汀与安慰剂的疗效(Robinson等人,2013年)。通过通径分析,研究表明,抑郁症状缓解的可能性有16%归因于治疗的直接效果,41%归因于疼痛减轻,其余归因于功能改善。此外,本试验还表明,与度洛西汀治疗的患者相比,在终点疼痛严重程度改善至少30%或50%的情况下,度洛西汀治疗的患者获得了更多的缓解(Gaynor等人,2011a,b)。根据这些发现,还应注意的是,尽管45%的纳入我们研究的患者在基线检查时有PPS,但这一百分比在8周时降至15%,在24周时降至5%。在我们的研究中,这些疼痛症状的改善可能进一步促进了度洛西汀在抑郁症预后和生活质量方面优于SSRIs。我们的观察结果也支持了这一点,即度洛西汀对SSRIs的影响在基线时有PPS的患者中比在基线时没有此类症状的患者更大。综上所述,我们的研究结果再次证实了控制疼痛症状在抑郁症治疗中的重要性,以及度洛西汀相对于SSRIs的潜在优势,至少对于伴有疼痛和抑郁的患者。<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: