对比计算结果，由齿面接触疲劳强度计算的模数m略大于齿根弯曲疲劳强度计算

Comparing the calculation results, the modulus m calculated from the contact fatigue strength of the tooth surface is slightly larger than the modulus calculated from the bending fatigue strength of the tooth root. Because the size of the gear modulus m mainly depends on the bearing capacity determined by the bending strength, the contact fatigue of the tooth surface The load-bearing capacity determined by the strength is only related to the gear diameter (that is, the modulus is related to the number of teeth multiplied by the machine). The modulus can be calculated from the bending strength of 3.94mm and rounded to 4mm. The diameter of the circle is calculated according to the contact strength:

Comparing the calculation results, the module m calculated by the flank contact fatigue intensity is slightly larger than the number of modules calculated by the root bending fatigue intensity, because the size of the gear module m mainly depends on the carrying capacity determined by the bending strength, and the carrying capacity determined by the flank contact fatigue intensity is only related to the gear diameter (i.e. the module is related to the tooth number multiplier), it is desirable to calculate the die number 3.94mm by bending strength, and rounded to 4mm, according to the contact strength score circle diameter:

Compared with the calculation results, the modulus m calculated by the tooth surface contact fatigue strength is slightly larger than that calculated by the tooth root bending fatigue strength. Because the gear modulus m mainly depends on the bearing capacity determined by the bending strength, and the bearing capacity determined by the tooth surface contact fatigue strength is only related to the gear diameter (that is, the modulus is related to the number of teeth), the modulus 3.94mm can be calculated from the bending strength, It is rounded to 4mm, and the dimension circle diameter is calculated according to the contact strength<br>