除了内容上的套路，还有一些关于喜剧创作

The play follows the routine commercial films nowadays, poor female counter-attack, wit, beauty, love stories, conflicts contradictions ...... But then, from the small office to see drama there is still a microcosm of society, feel between two classes gap. Eliza was in the play has a classic lines: "I ain'tdirty I washed my face and hands before I come, I did!." What is the real "dirty"? Eliza simply because nature sloppy, people will always think "dirty" it? By simple washing, you can really let themselves stay away from this "dirty" it? - I think this is supposed to every reader to ponder the question. <br>In fact, two classes can not be overstepped. This work of playwright George Bernard Shaw has been the best interpretation and expression. The author does not give Pygmalion Professor happy ending, but also in the fifth act, the highlights great changes behind Eliza thoroughly confused heart, saying about that is a kind of "underachievement" embarrassing situation . Two last dialogue is contradictory, after Eliza angry response from the dictates professor of global order an end, leaving layers of association. Love story between two classes, not just I wish you love so simple, many root characteristics, may not be running the two men had foreseen the future.

The whole play follows the current set of commercial film, poor women against the attack, talent, good people, love stories, conflicts ... ... But from the smallness of the play can still see the microcosm of society, feel the gap between the two classes. Eliza once had a classic line in the play: "I ain'tdirty! I washed my face and hands before i come, i did." What is the real "dirty"? Does Eliza feel "dirty" only because of her nature? With a simple flush, can you really keep yourself away from this "dirty"? I think this is a question that every reader should think about.<br>In fact, the two classes can not be crossed. The playwright Bernard Shaw has been the best interpretation and expression in this work. The author does not give a happy ending to the flower-selling girl and the professor, and in act until activism, it highlights Eliza's inner confusion after a thorough transformation, which is, as the saying goes, an awkward situation of "high not low." The last conversation between the two men was also contradictory, and after Eliza's angry response to the professor's stoicism, the whole thing ended with a layer of association. The love story between two classes is not just your love affair, many root traits, may have foreseen the future in which the two could not.

The whole play follows the pattern of current commercial films, such as the attack of poor women, talent, beauty, love story, conflict and contradiction However, we can still see the miniature of society and feel the gap between the two classes from the small part of the drama. Eliza once had a classic line in the play: "I ain't dirty! I washed my face and hands before I come, I did."? Does Eliza always feel dirty just because of her untidy nature? By simple washing, can you really keep yourself away from this "dirty" from now on? ——I think this is a question that every reader should ponder.<br>In fact, the two classes cannot arrogate. Bernard Shaw's work has been the best interpretation and expression. The author doesn't give a happy ending to the flower seller and the professor, and in the fifth act, the author highlights Eliza's inner confusion after her complete transformation. As the saying goes, it is an embarrassing situation that "high is not low, but not low.". The last conversation between the two was also full of contradictions. After Eliza angrily responded to the professor's orders, the whole situation ended and left many associations. The love story between the two classes is not just about your love. I wish it were so simple. Many fundamental characteristics may have foreseen the future that the two could not run in.<br>