Assignees are encouraged to assign only one form of EUI-48 or EUI-64 identifier, regardless of application. In other words, the organization is encouraged to not assign the same identifier to multiple organizations for different end-application uses. The intent of this recommendation is to reduce possible errors introduced by the complexities of managing multiple context dependent address spaces within each organization. For example, EUI-48 values that specify I/O driver software interfaces, language codes, and hardware model numbers should never overlap. Similarly, EUI-64 values that specify I/O driver software interfaces, language codes, hardware model numbers, and hardware instances should never overlap. This no-overlap strategy is expected to reduce unintentional duplication of identifier values, by elimination of subjective application-class judgments, although a few more identifier values may be consumed.
Assignees are encouraged to assign only one form of EUI-48 or EUI-64 identifier, regardless of application. In other words, the organization is encouraged to not assign the same identifier to multiple organizations for different end-application uses. The intent of this recommendation is to reduce possible errors introduced by the complexities of managing multiple context dependent address spaces within each organization. <br>For example, EUI-48 values that specify I/O driver software interfaces, language codes, and hardware model numbers should never overlap. Similarly, EUI-64 values that specify I/O driver software interfaces, language codes, hardware model numbers, and hardware instances should never overlap. This no-overlap strategy is expected to reduce unintentional duplication of identifier values, by elimination of subjective application-class judgments, although a few more identifier values may be consumed.
正在翻译中..