In the hyper–hypo theory, IDS is viewed as an adaptation to a receiver who cannot predict the message very well (Lindblom, 1990). Under optimal listening condi- tions, and when predictability of the message is high, speech is relaxed with more assimilation. This is termed hypospeech. When, in contrast, predictability is low and/or listening conditions are less than optimal, articulation becomes forceful with longer segments that are more audible, reducing ambiguity for the listener. This is called hyperspeech. A small infant does not have much linguistic expe- rience, and as a result, predictability will therefore almost always be low. When speaking to an infant, we will consequently use hyperspeech, manifested by IDS.
In the hyper–hypo theory, IDS is viewed as an adaptation to a receiver who cannot predict the message very well (Lindblom, 1990). Under optimal listening condi- tions, and when predictability of the message is high, speech is relaxed with more assimilation. This is termed hypospeech. When, in contrast, predictability is low and/or listening conditions are less than optimal, articulation becomes forceful with longer segments that are more audible, reducing ambiguity for the listener. This is called hyperspeech. A small infant does not have much linguistic expe- rience, and as a result, predictability will therefore almost always be low. When speaking to an infant, we will consequently use hyperspeech, manifested by IDS.<br>
正在翻译中..