依据主观客观相互一致的原则，所有在客观上对产生社会危害的行为起到影响或

According to the principle of subjective and objective mutual agreement, all factors that objectively affect or determine socially harmful behaviors will be responsible for criminal responsibility in the end, so it must be necessary to have a necessary connection with the actor's subjective crime In other words, only under the condition that the actual actor has the possibility of personnel or knowledge of this kind of causality, can it become an objective basis with influence and even the determination of criminal responsibility. In concrete terms, all intentional criminal acts must have a certain understanding before the act that produces a harmful result, that is, they need to have the "knowledge" premise. Criminal behavior is impossible

According to the principle of subjective objectivity and mutual consistency, all the factors that objectively influence or decide on the behavior of social harm will have responsibility for criminal responsibility in the end, then it is necessary to have a necessary connection with the subjective sin of the perpetrator, in other words, only if the de facto perpetrator has the personnel or the existence of understanding of such causality, can become an objective basis that has influence or even determine criminal responsibility. In particular, all intentional criminal acts, perpetrators must have a certain understanding before producing harmful results of the act, that is, the need to have a "knowing" premise, if there is no knowledge of course there is no later acts, so intentional criminal acts can not be established

According to the principle of mutual consistency of subjective and objective, all the factors that objectively affect or determine the behavior that causes social harm will be responsible for criminal responsibility in the end, so it is necessary to have a necessary connection with the subjective fault of the actor. In other words, only when the actual actor has the possibility of personnel or existence understanding of such causality Under the condition of practice, it can become the objective basis of influencing and even determining criminal responsibility. Specifically speaking, all intentional criminal acts, the perpetrator must have a certain understanding before the acts that produce harmful results, that is, the premise of "knowing", if not knowing, of course, there will be no subsequent intentional criminal acts, so intentional criminal acts can not be established