“冰桶挑战”这项活动的初衷本是好的，就是想让更多的人体验“渐冻人”的痛

The original intention of the "Ice Bucket Challenge" was a good one. It wanted more people to experience the pain of "gradual freezing" and called on people to help ALS patients. This has indeed played a positive role. But over time, people have focused on "who has more ice water", "who has bigger ice cubes", and "who donates more money". This was a departure from the pre-determined track, but people continued to go on happily, and even named the "Most Creative Award" and "Most Authentic Award". (Propose a central point) I think the reason for this situation is probably the so-called "star effect."

The original intention of the "ice bucket challenge" activity was good. It was to let more people experience the pain of "gradually freezing people" and call on people to help ALS patients. This has indeed played a positive role. But with the passage of time, people focus on "who has more ice water", "who has bigger ice cubes" and "who donates more money". This was a deviation from the predetermined track, but people continued to go on happily, and even rated the "Most Creative Award" and "most authentic Award". I think the reason for this situation is probably the so-called "star effect".<br>

The original intention of "Ice Bucket Challenge" was good, that is, it wanted more people to experience the pain of "freezing people" and called on people to help ALS patients. This has indeed played a positive role. But as time goes by, people focus on "who has more ice water", "who has more ice" and "who donates more money". This book deviated from the predetermined track, but people went on happily, and even commented on "the most creative award" and "the most authentic award". I think the reason for this situation is probably the so-called "star effect".