节欲论是一种关于利润(利息)来源的理论。它以“节欲”来说明资本的产生，

Abstinence theory is a theory of profit (interest) sources. It "abstinence" to illustrate generated capital, and to justify profits. First appeared in the UK Hobbes, Minsk Roper and France's Jean-Pierre Garnier, who remarks. Britain's most famous West Neal discussion. He believes that there are three factors of production, in addition to natural and labor, the need for more capital. The results capitalist control desire is to obtain capital. They will be able to bring the capital to produce more consumer goods in the future rather than for immediate consumption aspects of life. Like their own labor is as comfortable sacrifice, "abstinence" is the capitalist sacrifice currently enjoy. Since the natural elements widely available, is not in itself the causes of its value, so that labor and abstinence together, that is shared sacrifice workers and capitalists create value, in order to pay the corresponding remuneration. Compensation expense of ease people were paid wages, remuneration is paid abstinence capitalist profits, so the profit is definitely not improper revenue. After Western economists generally accepted abstinence theory of West Neal. But their concept of abstinence there were different interpretations. Later, Marshall with "waiting" to replace the word "abstinence" that interest as a reward for saving behavior is the result of a wait. West Neal Marshall of the above point of view, is still an important part of the profits of western economics theory.

Abstinence is a theory about the source of profit (interest). It uses abstinence to explain the creation of capital and to justify profits. It was first revealed in the comments of the British Hobbs, Klopp and France's Garnier. Britain's Sinier's discourse is most famous. He believes that there are three elements of production, in addition to nature and labor, but also the need for capital. The result of capitalists' desire to control is the acquisition of capital. They are using capital to produce more consumer goods in the future, rather than on immediate consumption of life. Just as labor is a sacrifice of comfort, abstinence is the sacrifice of the capitalists for the present enjoyment. Since natural elements are readily available, they are not the cause of value in themselves, so that together labour and abstinence, i.e. the common sacrifice of workers and capitalists, create value and thus pay the corresponding remuneration. The reward paid for the comfort of the common people is the salary, and the remuneration paid to the capitalists is the profit, so the profit is definitely not improper income. Later, Western economists generally accepted Sinier's abstinence. But they have different interpretations of the concept of abstinence. Later, Marshall used the word "wait" instead of "abstinence", arguing that interest as a reward for savings was a result of waiting. The above-mentioned views of Sinier and Marshall are still an important part of profit theory in western economics.

Abstinence theory is a theory about the source of profit (interest). It uses "abstinence" to explain the production of capital and to demonstrate the rationality of profit. It was first seen in the comments of Hobbes in England, scrip in France and Garnier in France. Neil of England is the most famous. He believes that there are three elements of production, in addition to nature and labor, but also the need for capital. The result of the capitalist's controlling desire is the acquisition of capital. They spend their capital on production that will bring more consumer goods in the future, rather than on immediate consumption. Just as labor is the sacrifice of one's own comfort, "abstinence" is the sacrifice of the capitalist to the present enjoyment. Because natural elements are available everywhere, they are not the cause of value. In this way, labor and abstinence create value together, that is, the common sacrifice of workers and capitalists, so they have to pay the corresponding remuneration. The reward paid for the sacrifice of common people's comfort is salary, and the reward paid for the capitalist's abstinence is profit, so the profit is definitely not improper income. Later, western economists generally accepted the theory of celibacy. But they have different interpretations of the concept of abstinence. Later, Marshall used the word "waiting" instead of "abstinence", and thought that interest as the reward of saving behavior was the result of waiting. So far, the above viewpoints of sinier and Marshall are still an important part of profit theory in western economics.<br>