本文有很多结论。Bailin et al. (1999)根据智力资源来

This article has a lot of conclusions. Bailin et al. (1999) to explain and defend the point of view of the ability of critical thinking, including background knowledge, critical thinking standard of knowledge, to master the critical concepts based on intellectual resources, useful for critical thinking strategies or heuristic knowledge and certain habits of mind. Before Bailin et al. (1999) detailed explanation of each component, it is necessary to clarify the nature of considerations led to this concept. All in all, as educators, as commonly understood, Bailin et al (1999) believe that critical thinking has at least the following three features: This is done to the determination to believe or what to do; people engaged in thinking about trying to achieve for adequacy and accuracy standards to thinking; thinking the relevant standards reaches a certain threshold level. Bailin et al. (1999) considered a good concept of the main benefits of critical thinking and critical thinkers that can provide very specific knowledge of teaching critical thinking. The best way to characterize the critical thinkers of intellectual resources, including: background knowledge, a good working knowledge of standard thinking, the key concepts of criticism, heuristics (strategies, programs, etc.) knowledge and habits of mind.

There are many conclusions in this article. Bailin et al. (1999) articulates and defends the ability of opinion in critical thinking, including background knowledge, knowledge of critical thinking standards, mastery of critical concepts, strategic or heuristic knowledge useful for critical thinking, and certain thinking habits based on intellectual resources. Before Bailin et al. (1999) explains each component in detail, it is necessary to clarify the nature of the considerations that led to this concept. In summary, as educators generally understand, Bailin et al. (1999) believes that critical thinking has at least three characteristics: to do so in order to make up their minds to believe or do something; Thinking makes the relevant standards reach a certain threshold level. Bailin et al. (1999) considers that the main advantage of good critical thinking concepts and critical thinkers is that they can provide quite specific knowledge about the teaching of critical thinking. The best way to characterize critical thinkers is intellectual resources, including: background knowledge, operational knowledge of good thinking standards, key critical concepts, heuristics (strategies, procedures, etc.) and thinking habits.

There are many conclusions in this paper. Bailin et al. (1999) elaborates and defends the perspective ability in critical thinking according to intellectual resources, including background knowledge, knowledge of critical thinking standards, mastery of critical concepts, strategy or heuristic knowledge useful for critical thinking and some thinking habits. Before Bailin et al. (1999) explained each component in detail, it was necessary to understand the nature of the considerations that led to this concept. In a word, as generally understood by educators, Bailin et al. (1999) believes that critical thinking has at least three characteristics: it is to make up one's mind to believe or do something; people engaged in thinking try to reach the standard of adequacy and accuracy suitable for thinking; and thinking makes relevant standards reach a certain threshold level. Bailin et al. (1999) thinks that the main advantage of good critical thinking concepts and critical thinkers is that they can provide quite specific knowledge for the teaching of critical thinking. The best way to represent critical thinkers is intellectual resources, including: background knowledge, operational knowledge of good thinking standards, key critical concepts, heuristic (strategy, procedure, etc.) knowledge and thinking habits.