疗程结束及随访时三组总有效率之间无差异（P＞0.05）；而疗程结束后的

The end of treatment and follow-up three groups there was no difference between the total efficiency (P> 0.05); significant cure rate after the end of treatment, acupuncture combination group was no statistically significant (P> 0.05) compared with the combination group acupuncture sET group comparison group was statistically significant (P <0.01, P <0.05); significant rate during the follow-up treatment, acupuncture group and the combination group compared to the group sET statistically significant (P <0.05), compared to the acupuncture group sET group was not statistically significant (P> 0.05).

疗程结束及随访时三组总有效率之间无差异（P＞0.05）；而疗程结束后的治显率，联合组相比针刺组无统计意义（P＞0.05），联合组与针刺组对比SET组有统计意义（P＜0.01，P＜0.05）；而随访时的治显率，联合组相比针刺组与SET组有统计意义（P＜0.05），而针刺组相比SET组无统计意义（P＞0.05）。

There was no difference in the total effective rate between the three groups at the end of the course of treatment and follow-up (P > 0.05); but there was no statistical significance between the combined group and the acupuncture group (P > 0.05), and there was statistical significance between the combined group and the acupuncture group compared with the set group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05); while there was statistical significance between the combined group and the set group at the end of the course of treatment and the acupuncture group compared with the acupuncture group (P < 0.05) There was no statistical significance in set group (P > 0.05).<br>