Indefiniteness, on the other hand, is evaluated based on whether the scope of an element(s) is so broad that for a POSA, it is not possible to reproduce the invention despite the written description and specifications provided in the patent without undue experimentation and reasonable degree of success (Section 103; US Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. 112). The claimed patentable scientific work is assessed for anticipation on whether all elements of the claim(ed) invention are present in one single document that is available in public domain (Section 103; US Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. XXX). Taking a closer look at the criteria for patentability of the scientific work, should it be rationalized based on dissolution and/or release testing data, it is evident that the claimed invention (scientific work) should primarily be novel, innovative, non-obvious, non-anticipated, non-inherent, enabled, and not indefinite proven through preponderance of evidence and beyond reasonable doubt.