In other words, there is a new and

换句话说，在学生及其父母对大学学习的思考方式上，职业重点越来越新。<br><br>在最近离开人文学科的转变中，存在一定的直觉。它暗示了许多事情。第一，急于使教育获得回报的前提是，只有最直接适用的技能才值得获得。第二，人文学科常常在解释人文学科为何重要方面做得不好。第三，人文学科常常在教授人文学科方面做得不好。

换句话说，在学生和家长思考在大学学习的方式上，职业重点正在缩小。<br><br>在最近从人文学科转向时，有一定的字面性。它提出了许多方面。其一，急于让教育获得回报，前提是只有最直接适用的技能才值得获得。第二，人文学科往往做不好的工作，解释为什么人文学科重要。第三，人文学科在人文学科的教学上往往做不好的工作。

In other words, there is a new and narrowing vocational emphasis in the way students and their parents think about what to study in college.There is a certain literal-mindedness in the recent shift away from the humanities. It suggests a number of things. One, the rush to make education pay off presupposes that only the most immediately applicable skills are worth acquiring. Two, the humanities often do a bad job of explaining why the humanities matter. And three, the humanities often do a bad job of teaching the humanities.<br>