While it is difficult to adequately summarize 40 responses, several themes emerged. Skepticism about the application of eCPR as a desperate measure was balanced by guarded optimism that in very tightly controlled applications this may be truly life-saving and neuroprotective. Most respondents commented favorably on the need for and utility of simulation, both on technical grounds and to build effective teamwork. Only a few respondents indicated that they employed percutaneous cannulation techniques. Additionally,several respondents mentioned the idea of screening ICU patients for eCPR candidacy, implying further that this may help improve outcomes by restricting the applications to best candidates and preparing patients and teams for rapid cannulation.