为使源语和目的语之间的转换有一个标准，减少差异，尤金·奈达从语言学的角

In order to make the conversion between the source language and the target language have a standard and reduce the difference, Eugene Nida, from the perspective of linguistics, according to the essence of translation, put forward the famous translation theory of "dynamic equivalence", that is, "functional equivalence". equal". In this theory, he pointed out that "translation is to use the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language to reproduce the information of the source language from semantics to style" (Guo Jianzhong, 2000, P65). Nida's definition of translation indicates that translation is not only lexical equivalence but also semantic, stylistic and stylistic equivalence, and the information conveyed by translation has both surface lexical information and deep cultural information. The equivalence in "dynamic equivalence" includes four aspects: 1. lexical equivalence, 2. syntactic equivalence, 3. textual equivalence, and 4. stylistic equivalence. Among these four aspects, Nida believes that "meaning is the most important, and form is second" (Guo Jianzhong)

In order to set a standard for the transformation between the source language and the target language and reduce the differences, Eugene Nida puts forward the famous "dynamic equivalence" translation theory, namely "functional equivalence", from the perspective of linguistics and according to the essence of translation. In this theory, He pointed out that "translation is to reproduce the information of the source language from semantics to style in the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language" (Guo Jianzhong, 2000, p65). Nida's definition of translation indicates that translation is not only the equivalence of lexical meaning, but also the equivalence of semantics, style and style. The information conveyed by translation includes both surface lexical information and deep cultural information. "Dynamic equivalence" Equivalence in includes four aspects: 1 Lexical equivalence, 2 Syntactic equivalence, 3 Textual equivalence, 4 Stylistic equivalence. Among these four aspects, Nida believes that "meaning is the most important, followed by form" (Guo Jianzhong)

In order to make the conversion between source language and target language have a standard and reduce the differences, Eugene Nida put forward the famous translation theory of "dynamic equivalence", namely "functional equivalence", from the perspective of linguistics and according to the essence of translation. In this theory, he pointed out that "translation is to reproduce the information of the source language from semantics to style in the most appropriate, natural and equivalent language" (Guo Jianzhong, 2000, P65). Nida's definition of translation indicates that translation is not only equivalent in lexical sense but also equivalent in semantics, style and style. The information conveyed by translation includes both superficial lexical information and deep cultural information. The equivalence in "dynamic equivalence" includes four aspects: 1. lexical equivalence, 2. syntactic equivalence, 3. textual equivalence and 4. stylistic equivalence. Among these four aspects, Nida believes that "meaning is the most important, followed by form" (Guo Jianzhong)