After adding three correlation coefficients between error terms in the three-factor model (all error terms within the same factor), the goodness-of-fit measures indicated a good goodness-of-fit across the four cross-cultural samples on the metric measurement invariance level (χ2 = 453.42, χ2/df = 1.70, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .038, Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = .916, comparative fit index [CFI] = .928), indicating that respondents across the different cultural groups attribute the same meaning to the latent construct under study (Van de Schoot, Lugtig, & Hox, 2012). We compared the hypothesized three-factor model (TG, PoINT, and Endurance of Ingroup Suffering) with a two-factor (PoINT and Endurance of Ingroup Suffering combined) and one-factor structure.